Effectiveness of bottom guarding nets in reducing bycatch in prawn (Penaeus spp.) trammel net fishery along the coast of Ban Nam Khem, Phang-Nga, Thailand

Authors
Boonserm, P., Ebata, K., Whanpetch, N., Pokavanich, T., Sangeamwong, T. and Jaingam, W.
Year
Journal/Publisher Name
Fisheries Science
Page #s
pp. 1-16
Contact information
Keigo Ebata ebata@fish.kagoshima-u.ac.jp
Phatcharapol Boonserm phatcharapol.bo@ku.th
Napakhwan Whanpetch tearna@gmail.com
Tanuspong Pokavanich tanuspong.p@ku.ac.th
Thanakorn Sangeamwong thanakorn.msci@gmail.com
Wachirah Jaingam wachirah.j@ku.th
The Graduate School, Kasetsart University, Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900, Thailand 2
Department of Marine Science, Faculty of Fisheries, Kasetsart University, Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
Faculty of Fisheries, Kagoshima University, Shimoarata 45020, Kagoshima 8900056, Japan
Summary

Guarding nets may potentially help mitigate bycatch in trammel net fisheries through the attachment of a supplementary netting panel, typically 10–30 cm high and made of materials that resist entanglement, between the footrope and the main trammel net. Acting as a physical barrier, the panel prevents benthic organisms from becoming trapped. In a small-scale prawn trammel net fishery in Thailand, biomass of non-target organisms was significantly reduced while maintaining target species volume compared with conventional nets. However, the volume of commercial bycatch species was also significantly reduced, which may create a barrier to adoption in small-scale fisheries.  

Field Studies

Effectiveness of bottom guarding nets in reducing bycatch in prawn (Penaeus spp.) trammel net fishery along the coast of Ban Nam Khem, Phang-Nga, Thailand

Study Type
Field study in the wild
Location
Ban Nam Khem Vietnam
Target catch
Giant tiger prawn (Penaeus monodon); Banana prawn (Penarus merguiensis)
Effect on bycatch species
18.7% decrease in the number of species caught, 54.6% reduction in total individuals caught, 39.9% decrease in total catch weight. Discarded non-target species decreased by 74.4% by weight. Commercial species bycatch decreased by 27.7%.
Effect on target catch
Non-significant reduction in target species catch and catch per unit effort. 
Bycatch species
Reduction technique
Fishing Gear