Skip to main content
Home

 

Register/Add a study

Menu

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Search The Database

Search The Database

Search Database Menu

  • View All Articles
  • Techniques Glossary
  • Fishing Gear Types
  • Add a Study
Displaying 11 - 20 of 93
Location Gear Catch Technique Bycatch species Type Results

Scotland

Trout
Passive acoustic deterrents
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters) Field study in the wild
Summary: Passive acoustic deterrents increased avoidance actions of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) to barriers simulating surface-set gillnets in the Moray Firth, Scotland.
Effect on Bycatch: Increased avoidance actions
Reference:
Goodson, A.D. and R.H. Mayo, 1995 , Interactions between free-ranging dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) and passive acoustic gill-net deterrent devices

Florida

Hooks and Lines
King mackerel
Quick-release gear
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters) Field study in the wild
Summary: A quick-release metal wire added to the Florida king mackerel troll fishery reduced depredation of catch by bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus). There was no impact on king mackerel catch.
Effect on Bycatch: Reduced depredation
Reference:
Zollett, E.A. and A.J. Read, 2006 , Depredation of catch by bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in the Florida king mackerel (Scomberomorus cavalla) troll fishery

United Kingdom

Trawls
Bass
Excluder devices
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters) Field study in the wild
Summary: An excluder device, tested in the United Kingdom bass pair trawl fishery, reduced bycatch of common dolphins (Delphinus delphis). There was a negligible loss of target fish (<1%).
Effect on Bycatch: Reduced bycatch
Reference:
Northridge, S., 2003 , Further development of a dolphin exclusion device

Canada

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
Multiple species
Metal oxide/barium sulfate nets
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise), Seabirds Field study in the wild
Summary: Metal oxide nets containing barium sulphate (that increased their acoustic reflectivity and probably also their stiffness) reduced the bycatch of harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) in an eastern Canada demersal gillnet fishery. No difference in catch of commercial fish species, including cod, pollock, haddock, and spiny dogfish, was observed between the nylon and barium sulphate nets. Metal oxide nets reduced the bycatch of greater shearwater (Puffinus gravis) in an eastern Canada demersal gillnet fishery, probably by increasing the visibility of the blue-dyed nets to the birds.
Effect on Bycatch: Reduced harbor porpoise bycatch
Reference:
Trippel, E.A., N.L. Holy, D.L. Palka, T.D. Shepherd, G.D. Melvin, and J.M. Terhune, 2003 , Nylon barium sulphate gillnet reduces porpoise and seabird mortality

Captivity

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
Trout
Metal oxide/barium sulfate nets
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise) Field study in the wild
Summary: Metal oxide nets made from barium sulphate increased the detectability of gillnets by marine mammals when compared to nylon nets when approached at angles of incidence greater than normal incidence but less than 40 degrees. Hypothesized detection ranges indicate bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) should be able to detect metal oxide nets in time to avoid entanglement, but harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) may not be able to detect either net in time to avoid contact.
Effect on Bycatch: Increased detectability
Reference:
Mooney, T.A., P.E. Nachtigall, and W.W.L. Au, 2004 , Target strength of a nylon monofilament and an acoustically enhanced gillnet: predictions of biosonar detection ranges

United Kingdom

Trawls
Bass
Excluder devices
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters) Field study in the wild
Summary: An excluder device, tested in the United Kingdom bass pair trawl fishery, did not reduce bycatch of common dolphins (Delphinus delphis).
Effect on Bycatch: Did not reduce bycatch
Reference:
Northridge, S., A. Mackay, D. Sanderson, R. Woodcock, and A. Kingston, 2004 , A review of dolphin and porpoise bycatch issues in the Southwest of England

United Kingdom

Trawls
Bass
Acoustic deterrent devices
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters) Field study in the wild
Summary:

Acoustic pingers placed around the mouth of a pair trawl net in the United Kingdom bass pair trawl fishery did not reduce common dolphin (Delphinus delphis) bycatch.

Effect on Bycatch: Did not reduce bycatch
Reference:
Northridge, S, 2003 , Reduction of cetacean bycatch in pelagic trawls

United Kingdom

Trawls
Bass
Acoustic deterrent devices
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise) Field study in the wild
Summary:

Acoustic pingers placed in the rear of a pair trawl net in the United Kingdom bass pair trawl fishery did not reduce bycatch of common dolphins (Delphinus delphis). Multi-monofilament net, placed in the North Sea and West of Scotland gillnet fisheries, had no significant impact on harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) bycatch when compared to traditional monofilament net. Thin twine monofilament nets (.4mm twine diameter, 90 mm mesh size) reduced bycatch of harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) and seals in the North Sea and West of Scotland gillnet fisheries when compared to thick (.6mm twine diameter, 267 mm mesh size) monofilament nets. Barium sulphate nets had higher bycatch of harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) and seals in the North Sea and West of Scotland gillnet fisheries when compared to traditional gillnets.

Effect on Bycatch: Did not reduce bycatch
Reference:
Northridge, S., D. Sanderson, A. Mackay, and P. Hammond, 2003 , Analysis and mitigation of cetacean bycatch in UK fisheries

Scotland

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
Trout
Thin twine nets
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise) Field study in the wild
Summary:

Acoustic pingers placed in the rear of a pair trawl net in the United Kingdom bass pair trawl fishery did not reduce bycatch of common dolphins (Delphinus delphis). Multi-monofilament net, placed in the North Sea and West of Scotland gillnet fisheries, had no significant impact on harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) bycatch when compared to traditional monofilament net. Thin twine monofilament nets (.4mm twine diameter, 90 mm mesh size) reduced bycatch of harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) and seals in the North Sea and West of Scotland gillnet fisheries when compared to thick (.6mm twine diameter, 267 mm mesh size) monofilament nets. Barium sulphate nets had higher bycatch of harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) and seals in the North Sea and West of Scotland gillnet fisheries when compared to traditional gillnets.

Effect on Bycatch: Did not reduce bycatch
Reference:
Northridge, S., D. Sanderson, A. Mackay, and P. Hammond, 2003 , Analysis and mitigation of cetacean bycatch in UK fisheries

Scotland

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
Trout
Thin twine nets
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise) Field study in the wild
Summary:

Acoustic pingers placed in the rear of a pair trawl net in the United Kingdom bass pair trawl fishery did not reduce bycatch of common dolphins (Delphinus delphis). Multi-monofilament net, placed in the North Sea and West of Scotland gillnet fisheries, had no significant impact on harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) bycatch when compared to traditional monofilament net. Thin twine monofilament nets (.4mm twine diameter, 90 mm mesh size) reduced bycatch of harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) and seals in the North Sea and West of Scotland gillnet fisheries when compared to thick (.6mm twine diameter, 267 mm mesh size) monofilament nets. Barium sulphate nets had higher bycatch of harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) and seals in the North Sea and West of Scotland gillnet fisheries when compared to traditional gillnets.

Effect on Bycatch: Reduced bycatch
Reference:
Northridge, S., D. Sanderson, A. Mackay, and P. Hammond, 2003 , Analysis and mitigation of cetacean bycatch in UK fisheries

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • Page 1
  • Current page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »

©2026 Consortium for Wildlife Bycatch Reduction  |  All rights reserved

  • Home
  • About Us
  • What's Bycatch?
    • Species List
  • Database of Publications
    • Bycatch Reduction Techniques Fact Sheets
  • Research Programs
    • Consortium Publications
  • Our Donors and Partners
  • Funding Opportunities
  • Join the Exchange
  • News
  • Events
  • Log in