Skip to main content
Home

 

Register/Add a study

Menu

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Search The Database

Search The Database

Search Database Menu

  • View All Articles
  • Techniques Glossary
  • Fishing Gear Types
  • Add a Study
Displaying 21 - 30 of 93
Location Gear Catch Technique Bycatch species Type Results

Scotland

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
Trout
Metal oxide/barium sulfate nets
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise) Field study in the wild
Summary:

Acoustic pingers placed in the rear of a pair trawl net in the United Kingdom bass pair trawl fishery did not reduce bycatch of common dolphins (Delphinus delphis). Multi-monofilament net, placed in the North Sea and West of Scotland gillnet fisheries, had no significant impact on harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) bycatch when compared to traditional monofilament net. Thin twine monofilament nets (.4mm twine diameter, 90 mm mesh size) reduced bycatch of harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) and seals in the North Sea and West of Scotland gillnet fisheries when compared to thick (.6mm twine diameter, 267 mm mesh size) monofilament nets. Barium sulphate nets had higher bycatch of harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) and seals in the North Sea and West of Scotland gillnet fisheries when compared to traditional gillnets.

Effect on Bycatch: Increased bycatch
Reference:
Northridge, S., D. Sanderson, A. Mackay, and P. Hammond, 2003 , Analysis and mitigation of cetacean bycatch in UK fisheries

Florida

Traps
Crab
Trap guards (T-bars, otter guards)
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters) Field study in the wild
Summary: Trap guards, made of bungee cords, reduced interactions between bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) and the Indian River Lagoon blue crab (Callinectes sapidus) pot fishery.
Effect on Bycatch: Reduced interactions with gear
Reference:
Noke, W.D., and D.K. Odell, 2002 , Interactions between the Indian River Lagoon blue crab fishery and the bottlenose dolphin, Tursiops truncatus

southern Skagerrak Sea, Sweden

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
Cod (Gadus morhua) and pollock (Pollachius pollachius)
Acoustic deterrent devices
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise) Field study in the wild
Summary:

Pingers were tested to reduce harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) bycatch in bottom-set gillnets in the Swedish Skagerrak Sea. During the experiment, no harbor porpoise were caught in control or experimental gillnets, possibly as a result of a combination of factors including displacement of porpoise, high prey availability in other areas, or pingers acting as passive reflectors. Pingers did not affect the catch of target species, including cod (Gadus morhua) and pollock (Pollachius pollachius).

Effect on Bycatch: No bycatch of harbor porpoise in nets with or without pingers
Reference:
Carlström, J., P. Berggren, F. Dinnétz, and P. Börjesson, 2002 , A field experiment using acoustic alarms (pingers) to reduce harbour porpoise by-catch in bottom-set gillnets

California Current, United States

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
Swordfish and sharks
Acoustic deterrent devices
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Berardius bairdii (Baird's beaked whale), Mesoplodon carlhubbsi (Hubb's beaked whale), Mesoplodon stejnegeri (Stejneger’s beaked whale), Ziphius cavirostris (Cuvier’s beaked whale) Field study in the wild
Summary:

This study is based on seventeen years of fishery observer data collected aboard drift gillnet vessels fishing for swordfish and sharks in the California Current (United States). Since use of acoustic pingers began in 1996 (source level ∼135 dB RMS, re: 1 Pa @ 1 m, frequency 10–12 kHz, pulse duration = 300 ms, pulse interval = 4 s), there have been no beaked whale entanglements through 2006, in comparison to 33 entanglements from 1990-1998. 260 cetaceans representing 12 other species were observed entangled in the fishery from 1996-2006. 

Effect on Bycatch: No observed bycatch of beaked whales
Reference:
Carretta, J.V., J. Barlow, and L. Enriquez, 2008 , Acoustic pingers eliminate beaked whale bycatch in a gill net fishery

Brazil

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
Acoustic deterrent devices
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters) Field study in the wild
Summary:

Underwater acoustic pingers were tested in Brazil to evaluate the behavioral responses of tucuxi (Sotalia fluviatilis). Five pingers were evenly placed on a floating 100 m line set along the dolphins' swimming parth in and out of sheltered waters. Dolphin sighting frequencies were recorded for functional and dummy pingers and control trials. Dolphin sightings were significantly lower in areas where the pinger line was set. Sighting frequency was significantly lower with active pingers than in dummy or control trials, but there wre no significant differences between the dummy and control trials. Preliminary results suggest that acoustic pingers attached to gillnets may be used to successfully prevent tucuxi bycatch.

Effect on Bycatch: Significantly reduced sightings of dolphins
Reference:
Montiero-Neto, C., Avila, F.J.C., Alves, T.T., Araujo, D.S., Campos, A.A., Martins, A.M.A., Parente, C.L., Furtado-Neto, M.A.A., Lien, J., 2004 , Behavioral responses of Sotalia fluviatilis (Cetacea, Delphinidae) to acoustic pingers, Fortaleza, Brazil

Shannon Estuary, Ireland

not applicable Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters) Field study in the wild
Summary: Trials to assess the behavioural response of free-ranging bottlenose dolphins to continuous and responsive pingers were conducted. In boat based trials both types of pinger affected dolphin behaviour, while in static trials the detection of dolphin vocalisations was significantly lower in the presence of active continuous pingers.
Effect on Bycatch: Change in behaviour of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in boat based trials.
Reference:
Leeney, R.H., Berrow, S., McGrath, D., O'Brien, J., Cosgrove, R. & Godley, B.J., 2007 , Effects of pingers on the behaviour of bottlenose dolphins

Balearic Islands, Spain

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
Mixed species
Acoustic deterrent devices
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Tursiops truncatus (Bottlenose dolphin) Field study in the wild
Summary:

A large scale pinger trial was conducted and results showed a 49% decrease dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) depredation rates when pingers were active. However the different pinger brands tried were not equally effective in reducing depredation. The AQUAmark 210 pingers had significant results, while Dukane Netmark 1000 and SaveWave Dolphinsaver High-impact did not have significant results. Profit per unit increased 9%.

Effect on Bycatch: 49% reduction in depredation rate by bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus)
Reference:
Brotons, J.M., Munilla, Z., Grau, A.M., Rendell, L., 2008 , Do pingers reduce interactions between bottlenose dolphins and nets around the Balearic Islands?

Mediterranean, Balearic Islands

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
Red mullet
Acoustic deterrent devices
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters) Field study in the wild
Summary:

The experiment tested the effects of Aquamark 100 pingers on the depredation rate of bottlenose dolphins on trammel nets. Results showed nets equipped with pingers had 87% fewer holes (attributed to damage by dolphins) than nets without pingers.

Effect on Bycatch: Reduced bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) depredation
Reference:
Gazo, M., Gonzalvo, ,J. and A. Aguilar, 2008 , Pingers as deterrents of bottlenose dolphins interacting with trammel nets

North Carolina, USA

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
Mixed
Acoustic deterrent devices
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters) Field study in the wild
Summary: The authors tested the behavioural response of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) to gill nets equipped with active and control Dukane NetMark 1000 pingers. Although dolphins were observed significantly fewer times within a 100m circular buffer zone from the alarms, overall results showed no significant differences in the number of groups observed, or closest approaches by animals to the net, between active and control periods.
Effect on Bycatch: No difference on group size or closest approach to the net between active and control pingers
Reference:
Cox, T.M, Read, A.J., Swanner, D., Urian, K. and D. Waples, 2004 , Behavioral responses of bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops truncatus, to gillnets and acoustic alarms

Turkey

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
turbot fish
Acoustic deterrent devices
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise) Field study in the wild
Summary: Gill nets fitted with Dukane NetMark 1000 pingers had significantly less bycatch of harbor porpoises than control nets and the fish size and catch rates of the target species were not affected.
Effect on Bycatch: Reduced harbor porpoise interactions with gillnet
Reference:
Göener, S., Bilgin, S., 2009 , The effect of pingers on harbour porpoise, Phocoena phocoena bycatch and fishing effort in the turbot gill net fishery in the Turkish Black Sea coast

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Current page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »

©2026 Consortium for Wildlife Bycatch Reduction  |  All rights reserved

  • Home
  • About Us
  • What's Bycatch?
    • Species List
  • Database of Publications
    • Bycatch Reduction Techniques Fact Sheets
  • Research Programs
    • Consortium Publications
  • Our Donors and Partners
  • Funding Opportunities
  • Join the Exchange
  • News
  • Events
  • Log in