Skip to main content
Home

 

Register/Add a study

Menu

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Search The Database

Search The Database

Search Database Menu

  • View All Articles
  • Techniques Glossary
  • Fishing Gear Types
  • Add a Study
Displaying 51 - 60 of 93
Location Gear Catch Technique Bycatch species Type Results

Peru

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
Sharks and rays
Acoustic deterrent devices
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Globicephala spp. (Pilot whale) Field study in the wild
Summary:

Acoustic pingers (Dukane Netmark 1000; frequency of 10-12 kHz and emit 300 ms tone every 4 sec with a source level range of 120-146 dB) were assessed to determine the effectiveness for reducing bycatch of dolphins and porpoises (common dolphins, dusky dolphins, bottlenose dolphins, Burmeister's porpoise, and pilot whales) by Peruvian small-scale driftnet fleets. Pingers were tested between April 2009 and August 2011. Twenty-two percent of the control nets captured small cetaceans and 16% of experimental nets captured small cetaceans. This was a 37% reduction in bycatch rates, suggesting that pingers may be effective in reducing bycatch of small cetaceans in this fishery. Catch rates of the fishery's target shark and ray species was not changed. 

Effect on Bycatch: 37% reduction of bycatch
Reference:
Mangel, J.C., Alfaro-Shigueto, J., Witt, M.J., Hodgson, D.J., and Godley, B.J., 2013 , Using pingers to reduce bycatch of small cetaceans in Peru's small-scale driftnet fishery

Neeltje Jans, The Netherlands

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
n/a
Acoustic deterrent devices

Passive acoustic deterrents
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise) Study in the lab
Summary:

Two porpoises were subjected to 3 different underwater sounds (standard Dukane alarm, random Dukane alarm, and a "bird alarm") in a enclosed floating pen. Their behavior during a 15 min test period was compared to behavior during a baseline 15 min period before the test and a recovery period after the test. All alarms resulted in increases in both the distance of the animals' surfacings from the alarms and their respiration rates. The standard Dukane alarm and the bird alarm were more effective than the random alarm in inducing animals to swim away from the source. 

Effect on Bycatch: Increased distance from the alarm source and respiration
Reference:
Kastelein, R.A., Rippe, H.T., Vaughan, N., Schooneman, N.M., Verboom, W.C., de Haan, D., 2000 , The effects of acoustic alarms on the behavior of harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) in a floating pen

Denmark

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
n/a
Acoustic deterrent devices
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise) Study in the lab
Summary:

Two captive harbor porpoises were exposed to three sound types (frequency from 100 kHz to 140 kHz, 200 ms long, and presented once per 4 s). Each session consisted of a 10 min period persound, a 5 min period of sound, and a 10 min period after the sound. Behavior was recorded on video and with dataloggers. Animals reacted most to the intial presentations of sound, but the reactinos diminished rapidly in repeated sessions. 

Effect on Bycatch: Initial response that diminished with additional trials
Reference:
Teilmann, J., Tougaard, J., Miller, L.A., Kirketerp, T., Hansen, K., Brando, S., 2006 , Reactions of captive harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) to pinger-like sounds

Bay of Fundy

n/a
Acoustic deterrent devices
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise) Field study in the wild
Summary:

A field test was conducted to test whether harbor porpoises habitutate to pingers over time. Echolocation and movements were monitored around a mooring equipped with a pinger (Dukane Netmark 1000) for 3 months. Initial displacement was 208 m from the pinger, but it diminished by 50% within 4 days. Echolocation rate and occurrence were significantly reduced near the pinger. 

Effect on Bycatch: Displaced porpoises initially by 208m, but decreased by 50% after four days
Reference:
Cox, T.M., Read, A.J., Solow, A., Tregenza, N., 2001 , Will harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) habituate to pingers?

Brazil

n/a Large Cetaceans (maximum length > 7.5 meters), Megaptera novaeangliae (Humpback whale), Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters) Field study in the wild
Summary:

This study qualitatively describes accidents between cetaceans and fishing boats on the Brazilian coast and the Central Amazon region through the perception of artisanal fishers. From 2005 to 2010, 215 interviews were conducted. Fishers identified encounters with five species: Inia geoffrensis, Sotalia guianensis, Tursiops truncatus, Eubalaena australis, and Megaptera novaeangliae. They said accidents occurred due to animal curiosity, high speed swimming, and calve protection. The authors propose co-management with local members, researchers, and the government to encourage feelings of collective ownership within communities aiming to minimize the number of collisions. 

Effect on Bycatch: n/a
Reference:
Zappes, C.A., de Sa Alves, L.C.P., da Silva, C.V., de Freitas Azevedo, A., Di Beneditto, A.P.M., Andriolo, A., 2013 , Accidents between artisanal fisheries and cetaceans on the Brazilian coast and Central Amazon: proposals for integrated management

n/a Large Cetaceans (maximum length > 7.5 meters), Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters) Summary study
Summary:

Potential risk of fisheries to cetaceans was assessed using a screening procedure based on a Productivity Susceptibility Analysis (PSA) using gears found in Ireland. Gillnets targeting demersal species was assessed as the fishery posing the greatest risk to cetaceans. Pelagic trawls targeting small pelagic species was found to pose a moderate risk to cetaceans. Specific gear-species interactions were also identified, such as humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) and pots/traps.  

Effect on Bycatch: Gillnets posed the most risk to cetaceans
Reference:
Brown, S.L., Reid, D., Rogan, E., 2013 , A risk-based approach to rapidly screen vulnerability of cetaceans to impacts from fisheries bycatch

California, United States

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
Swordfish and thresher shark
Acoustic deterrent devices
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Delphinus delphis (Short-beaked common dolphin), Pinnipeds, Zalophus californianus (California sea lion) Field study in the wild
Summary:

The long-term effectiveness of acoustic pingers in reducing marine mammal bycatch was assessed in the California swordfish and thresher shark drift gillnet fishery. Bycatch was observed at sea between 1990 and 2009, with acoustic pingers being present from 1996 to 2009. Bycatch rates of cetaceans decreased by around 50% when pingers were present; the decrease was mostly driven by common dolphins (Delphinus delphis). Beaked whales have not been incidentally caught since 1995. Pinger failure occurred in less than 4% of observed sets. Cetacean bycatch was 10 times higher in sets where more than one pinger failed. There was no evidence of habituation to pingers by cetaceans. Bycatch rates of California sea lions (Zalophus californianus) was almost double in sets with pingers than without, leading the authors to examine the "dinner bell" effect of pingers. Depredation of swordfish by sea lions was not linked to pinger use, instead the best predictors were total swordfish catch, month and area fished, and nighttime light use.   

Effect on Bycatch: Decreased cetacean bycatch and no habituation. Pinniped bycatch was not significantly different
Reference:
Carretta, JV and Barlow, J, 2011 , Long-term effectiveness, failure rates, and "dinner-bell" properties of acoustic pingers in a gillnet fishery

Northwestern Australia

Trawls
Excluder devices
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters) Summary study
Summary:

Logbook and observer data were used to assess common bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) bycatch patterns from 2003 to 2009 in the Pilbara trawl fishery. Dolphins were caught in all fishery areas, across all depths, and throughout the year. The bycatch rate from observers was 12.6 dolphins/1,000 trawls, which was double the rate reported in logbooks. The most significant predictors of dolphin catch were: vessel, time of day, and the use of bycatch reduction devices (BRDs). BRDs reduced catch by 45%.

Kerala, India

Surrounding nets and seine nets
Not identified
Fence or net barriers
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters) Field study in the wild
Summary:

Information on the use of Dolphin Wall Nets (DWN) by fisherman in Kerala, India was presented in this paper.  The DWN was designed by these fishermen to reduce dolphin attacks during fishing operations. Specifically humpbacked dolphins tend to congregate in fishing areas, surrounding the ring seine net and removing fish from the net.  This net design can be used by fishermen instead of crackers, which can cause harm to the dolphins. The authors provided fishermen from four stations in Kerala, India (Kasargode, Kozhikode, Ernakulum and Kollam) questionnaires to fill out. The questionnaires were designed to collect information on ring seine fishing operations, dolphin attacks and the structural details of the DWN when it was used.  The authors presented results on the structure of the DWN used by these fishermen but did not report any information regarding differences in bycatch rates between regular ring net operations and those using DWN.

Effect on Bycatch: Not statistically reported; study only administered a questionnaire that collected information on the structure and design of the Dolphin Wall Net (DWN)
Reference:
Prajith, K.K., Das, P.H.D., Edwin, L., 2014 , Dolphin Wall Net (DWN) - an innovative management measure devised by ring seine fishermen of Kerala-India to reducing or eliminating marine mammal-fishery interactions

Shannon Estuary, Ireland

Acoustic deterrent devices
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters) Field study in the wild
Summary: Trials to assess the behavioural response of free-ranging bottlenose dolphins to continuous and responsive pingers were conducted. In boat based trials both types of pinger affected dolphin behaviour, while in static trials the detection of dolphin vocalisations was significantly lower in the presence of active continuous pingers.
Effect on Bycatch: Change in vocalisation rate in static trials when continuous pingers were active
Reference:
Leeney, R.H., Berrow, S., McGrath, D., O'Brien, J., Cosgrove, R. & Godley, B.J., 2007 , Effects of pingers on the behaviour of bottlenose dolphins

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Current page 6
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • Page 10
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »

©2026 Consortium for Wildlife Bycatch Reduction  |  All rights reserved

  • Home
  • About Us
  • What's Bycatch?
    • Species List
  • Database of Publications
    • Bycatch Reduction Techniques Fact Sheets
  • Research Programs
    • Consortium Publications
  • Our Donors and Partners
  • Funding Opportunities
  • Join the Exchange
  • News
  • Events
  • Log in