Upcycled glass and plastic bottles offer potential low-cost mitigation to megafauna bycatch in gillnet fisheries

Authors
Berggren, P., Alfaro-Shigueto, J., Mangel, J.C., Sharpe, M., Jiddawi, N.S., Neasham, J., Larre, G., and A.J. Temple
Year
Journal/Publisher Name
Fisheries Research
Volume (Issue #)
298
Page #s
107748
Contact information
Per Berggren: per.berggren@ncl.ac.uk
Summary

The study tested the use of glass and plastic drink bottles as low-cost bycatch mitigation devices (mechanical pingers and acoustic reflectors, respectively) in gillnet fisheries across three regions/fisheries: surface-set driftnet fisheries in Zanzibar and Peru and bottom-set trammel net fisheries in Brazil. In Brazil, plastic bottles reduced dolphin bycatch while increasing fish catch, although further trials are needed. In Peru, glass bottles had no effect on dolphin, porpoise, or turtle bycatch but altered target elasmobranch and teleost catches; plastic bottles similarly had no effect on dolphin bycatch but increased shark catch. In Zanzibar, no dolphin bycatch was recorded in any sets, though plastic bottles increased tuna catch. 

Field Studies

Upcycled glass and plastic bottles offer potential low-cost mitigation to megafauna bycatch in gillnet fisheries

Study Type
Field study in the wild
Location
Menai Bay, Zanzibar, Tanzania
Target catch
Large pelagic finfish (primarily Euthynnus affinis, Katsuwonus pelamis, Istiophorus platypterus, Makaira indica, Xiphias gladius, and Scomberomorus commerson)
Effect on bycatch species
No dolphins caught in either control or treatment sets
Effect on target catch
Number of tunas caught significantly higher with plastic bottles versus control
Reduction technique

Upcycled glass and plastic bottles offer potential low-cost mitigation to megafauna bycatch in gillnet fisheries

Study Type
Field study in the wild
Location
Salaverry, Peru
Target catch
Elasmobranchs, dolphinfish (Coryphaena sp.), billfish (Xiphias sp.), and bonito (Sarda sp.)
Effect on bycatch species
No significant difference between control and glass and control and plastic bottles
Effect on target catch
No significant difference using plastic bottles, catch of target elasmobranchs was significantly reduced when using glass bottles
Reduction technique

Upcycled glass and plastic bottles offer potential low-cost mitigation to megafauna bycatch in gillnet fisheries

Study Type
Field study in the wild
Location
Torres and Passo de Torres, Brazil
Target catch
Brazilian flounder (Paralichtys spp.) and whitemouth croaker (Micropogonias furnieri)
Effect on bycatch species
No dolphins caught as bycatch in sets using plastic bottles, compared to four in the control (sample size too small to generate significance)
Effect on target catch
Weight of target species catch significantly higher when using plastic bottles
Reduction technique