Skip to main content
Home

 

Register/Add a study

Menu

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Search The Database

Search The Database

Search Database Menu

  • View All Articles
  • Techniques Glossary
  • Fishing Gear Types
  • Add a Study
Displaying 11 - 20 of 56
Location Gear Catch Technique Bycatch species Type Results

Hawaii

Hooks and Lines
Bigeye tuna
Deep sets
Sea Turtles Field study in the wild
Summary: Deep water setting techniques, tested on longline gear in Hawaii, reduced bycatch of sea turtles and striped marlin. Bycatch of target species, bigeye tuna, increased 1.27 times.
Effect on Bycatch: Reduced bycatch

off Hawaii

Hooks and Lines
Swordfish
Circle hooks
Sea Turtles Field study in the wild
Summary: To reduce turtle interactions, regulations for the Hawaii-based longline swordfish fishery required vessels to switch from using a J-shaped hook with squid bait to a wider circle-shaped hook with fish bait. Analyses of observer data showed that, following the introduction of the regulations, significant and large reductions in sea turtle and shark capture rates occurred without compromising target species catches. There was also a highly significant reduction in the proportion of turtles that swallowed hooks and a highly significant increase in the proportion of caught turtles that were released after removal of all terminal tackle. Research suggests that turtles aggregate at foraging grounds and that instituting methods to avoid real-time turtle bycatch hotspots may further reduce turtle interactions.
Effect on Bycatch: Leatherback turtle capture rates declined by 83% and loggerhead capture rates declined by 90%
Reference:
Gilman, E., D. Kobayashi, T. Swenarton, N. Brothers, P. Dalzell, and I. Kinan-Kelly, 2007 , Reducing sea turtle interactions in the Hawaii-based longline swordfish fishery

off Hawaii

Hooks and Lines
Swordfish
Circle hooks
Sea Turtles Field study in the wild
Summary: To reduce turtle interactions, regulations for the Hawaii-based longline swordfish fishery required vessels to switch from using a J-shaped hook with squid bait to a wider circle-shaped hook with fish bait. Analyses of observer data showed that, following the introduction of the regulations, significant and large reductions in sea turtle and shark capture rates occurred without compromising target species catches. There was also a highly significant reduction in the proportion of turtles that swallowed hooks and a highly significant increase in the proportion of caught turtles that were released after removal of all terminal tackle. Research suggests that turtles aggregate at foraging grounds and that instituting methods to avoid real-time turtle bycatch hotspots may further reduce turtle interactions.
Effect on Bycatch: Highly significant reduction in the proportion of turtles that swallowed hooks
Reference:
Gilman, E., D. Kobayashi, T. Swenarton, N. Brothers, P. Dalzell, and I. Kinan-Kelly, 2007 , Reducing sea turtle interactions in the Hawaii-based longline swordfish fishery

USA Mid-Atlantic

Dredge
sea scallops
Excluder devices
Sea Turtles Field study in the wild
Summary:

In 2003 and 2004 the scallop industry, Coonamessett Farm, and the Virginia Institute of Marine Fisheries, with funding from the NOAA Fisheries Service, successfully tested a series of chains that excluded turtles from entering the dredge bag. In twelve trials, divers videoed the results of placing turtle carcasses in the path of a modified scallop dredge. Turtle carcasses went over the dredge in all but three trials. Damage was assessed as “slight or none” in all valid assessments of damage to a carcass following an encounter.

Effect on Bycatch: Reduced serious injury
Reference:
Milliken, H.O., Belskis, L., DuPaul, W., Gearhart, J., Haas, H., Mitchell, J., Smolowitz, R. & Teas, W., 2007 , Evaluation of a modified scallop dredge's ability to reduce the likelihood of damage to loggerhead sea turtle carcasses

Pamlico Sound, North Carolina

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
flounder
Low profile gillnet
Sea Turtles Field study in the wild
Summary: Low profile gillnets with a panel height of six feet and no tie downs or additional floats had significantly fewer interactions with sea turtles and caught significantly less bycatch than standard gillnets. Catches of the target species (flounder) were also reduced in the low profile gillnets.
Effect on Bycatch: Reduced incidental capture of sea turtles and bycatch species
Reference:
Price, B., Van Salisbury, C., 2007 , Low-profile gillnet testing in the deep water region of Pamlico Sound, NC.

Pamlico Sound, North Carolina

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
flounder
Sub-surface sets (gillnets)
Sea Turtles Field study in the wild
Summary: Low profile gillnets with a panel height of six feet and no tie downs or additional floats had significantly fewer interactions with sea turtles and caught significantly less bycatch than standard gillnets. Catches of the target species (flounder) were also reduced in the low profile gillnets.
Effect on Bycatch: Reduced incidental capture of sea turtles and bycatch species
Reference:
Price, B., Van Salisbury, C., 2007 , Low-profile gillnet testing in the deep water region of Pamlico Sound, NC.

Northern Australia

Trawls
Prawns
Excluder devices
Sea Turtles Field study in the wild
Summary:

The catches from five experimental trawls (TED + fisheye BRD, upward facing TED, downward facing TED, bigeye BRD and square-mesh panel BRD) were compared to those of the standard twin Florida Flyer prawn trawl. Nets with a combination of a TED and BRD reduced sea turtle catches by 100%, large sponges by 85.3%, sharks by 36.3% and rays by 17.7% and reduced the proportion of soft and damaged prawns by 41.6% and catches of tiger prawns by 6.5%. Upward and downward facing TEDs reduced sea turtle bycatch by 99% and 100% respectively and large sponges by 81.6% and 95.9% respectively. Catches of tiger prawns (P. semisulcatus and P. esculentus) were reduced by 6.3% with the use of TEDs. The BRDs had little impact on the catch of either target or bycatch species.

Effect on Bycatch: Reduced sea turtle catches by 100%
Reference:
Brewer, D., Heales, D., Milton, D., Dell, Q., Fry, G., Venables, B., Jones, P., 2006 , The impact of turtle excluder devices and bycatch reduction devices on diverse tropical marine communities in Australia's northern prawn trawl fishery

Western Australia

Trawls
Red emperor, scarlet perch, spangled emperor, Rankin cod, blue spot emperor, rosy threadfin brea, flagfish, frypan snapper, red snapper and goldband snapper
Excluder devices
Sea Turtles Field study in the wild
Summary: A semi-flexible exclusion grid with a bar spacing of 15.5 cm reduced dolphin bycatch in the Pilbara trawl fishery by close to 50% and reduced the bycatch of sea turtles, large sharks and rays. However, the fate of the dolphins that encountered the grid and escaped is unknown.
Effect on Bycatch: Reduced catches rates from 26.2 (catch per 1000 shots) to 0.9
Reference:
Stephenson, P.C., Wells, S., King, J.A., 2008 , Evaluation of exclusion grids to reduce the bycatch of dolphins, turtles, sharks and rays in the Pilbara trawl fishery

Northwest Africa

Trawls
Sardinella
Excluder devices
Sea Turtles Field study in the wild
Summary:

The addition of a filter grid (inclined at ca. 20 degrees) that leads to an escape tunnel in trawl nets allowed 100% of rays and turtles to escape, 75% of manta rays, 40% of billfish and between 20-75% of sharks to escape.

Effect on Bycatch: Allowed 100% of sea turtles to escape
Reference:
Zeeberg, J., Corten, A., Graff, E., 2006 , Bycatch and release of pelagic megafauna in industrial trawler fisheries off Northwest Africa

Northern Australia

Trawls
Prawns
Excluder devices
Sea Turtles Field study in the wild
Summary:

The catches from five experimental trawls (TED + fisheye BRD, upward facing TED, downward facing TED, bigeye BRD and square-mesh panel BRD) were compared to those of the standard twin Florida Flyer prawn trawl. Nets with a combination of a TED and BRD reduced sea turtle catches by 100%, large sponges by 85.3%, sharks by 36.3% and rays by 17.7% and reduced the proportion of soft and damaged prawns by 41.6% and catches of tiger prawns by 6.5%. Upward and downward facing TEDs reduced sea turtle bycatch by 99% and 100% respectively and large sponges by 81.6% and 95.9% respectively. Catches of tiger prawns (P. semisulcatus and P. esculentus) were reduced by 6.3% with the use of TEDs. The BRDs had little impact on the catch of either target or bycatch species.

Effect on Bycatch: Downward facing TEDs reduced sea turtle catches by 100%
Reference:
Brewer, D., Heales, D., Milton, D., Dell, Q., Fry, G., Venables, B., Jones, P., 2006 , The impact of turtle excluder devices and bycatch reduction devices on diverse tropical marine communities in Australia's northern prawn trawl fishery

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • Page 1
  • Current page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »

©2026 Consortium for Wildlife Bycatch Reduction  |  All rights reserved

  • Home
  • About Us
  • What's Bycatch?
    • Species List
  • Database of Publications
    • Bycatch Reduction Techniques Fact Sheets
  • Research Programs
    • Consortium Publications
  • Our Donors and Partners
  • Funding Opportunities
  • Join the Exchange
  • News
  • Events
  • Log in