Skip to main content
Home

 

Register/Add a study

Menu

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Search The Database

Search The Database

Search Database Menu

  • View All Articles
  • Techniques Glossary
  • Fishing Gear Types
  • Add a Study
Displaying 11 - 20 of 84
Location Gear Catch Technique Bycatch species Type Results

Hawaii

Hooks and Lines
Swordfish
Night sets
Seabirds Field study in the wild
Summary: Night sets reduce bycatch of seabirds in the Hawaiian swordfish longline fishery.
Effect on Bycatch: Reduced bycatch
Reference:
Boggs, C.H., 2003 , Annual Report on the Hawaii Longline Fishing Experiments to Reduce Sea Turtle Bycatch under ESA Section 10 Permit 1303

Washington State

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
Salmon Seabirds Field study in the wild
Summary: Opaque mesh netting placed strategically on gillnets decreased bycatch of rhinoceros auklet (Cerorhinca monocerata) and common mure (Uria aalge) seabirds but also decreased catch of target salmon species in the Puget Sound, USA.
Effect on Bycatch: Reduced bycatch
Reference:
Melvin, E. and L. Conquest, 1996 , Reduction of seabird bycatch in salmon drift gillnet fisheries: 1995 sockeye/pink salmon fishery final report

Hawaii

Hooks and Lines
Swordfish and tuna
Side sets
Seabirds Field study in the wild
Summary:

Side-setting in combination with a bird curtain resulted in the lowest seabird-- Black-footed albatross (Phoebastria nigripes) and Laysan albatross (Phoebastria immutabilis)--capture rate when placed on pelagic longline gear for tuna and swordfish in Hawaiian waters when compared to underwater setting chutes and blue-dyed bait.

Effect on Bycatch: Resulted in lowest capture rate when used with bird curtain
Reference:
Gilman, E., N. Brothers, and D.R. Kobayashi, 2007 , Comparison of three seabird bycatch avoidance methods in Hawaii pelagic longline fisheries

Hawaii

Hooks and Lines
Swordfish and tuna
Bird curtain
Seabirds Field study in the wild
Summary:

Side-setting in combination with a bird curtain resulted in the lowest seabird-- Black-footed albatross (Phoebastria nigripes) and Laysan albatross (Phoebastria immutabilis)--capture rate when placed on pelagic longline gear for tuna and swordfish in Hawaiian waters when compared to underwater setting chutes and blue-dyed bait.

Effect on Bycatch: Resulted in lowest capture rate when used with side-setting
Reference:
Gilman, E., N. Brothers, and D.R. Kobayashi, 2007 , Comparison of three seabird bycatch avoidance methods in Hawaii pelagic longline fisheries

North Pacific

Hooks and Lines
Swordfish
Side sets
Seabirds Field study in the wild
Summary: Side-setting of longline fishing gear in the western North Pacific deterred seabirds-- Black-footed albatross (Phoebastria nigripes) and Laysan albatross Phoebastria immutabilis)?from taking bait and improved the sinking rate of baited hooks.
Effect on Bycatch: Deterred seabirds from taking bait
Reference:
Yokota, K. and Kiyota, M., 2006 , Preliminary report of side-setting experiments in a large sized longline vessel

Hawaii

Hooks and Lines
Swordfish and tuna
Sub-surface sets (gillnets)
Seabirds Field study in the wild
Summary: Underwater setting chutes, blue-dyed bait, and side-sets each reduced the bycatch of seabirds (Laysan and black-footed albatross and short-tailed shearwater) in the Hawaiian longline tuna and swordfish fisheries. Side-sets showed the most promise for a bycatch mitigation technique while blue-dyed bait was the least effective at reducing seabird bycatch and shows the least promise of these methods as an effective bycatch mitigation strategy.
Effect on Bycatch: Reduced bycatch
Reference:
Gilman, E., N. Brothers, and D. Kobayashi, 2003 , Performance Assessment of Underwater Setting Chutes, Side-Setting, and Blue-Dyed Bait to Minimize Seabird Mortality in Hawaii Pelagic Longline Tuna and Swordfish Fisheries

Hawaii

Hooks and Lines
Swordfish and tuna
Dyed bait
Seabirds Field study in the wild
Summary: Underwater setting chutes, blue-dyed bait, and side-sets each reduced the bycatch of seabirds (Laysan and black-footed albatross and short-tailed shearwater) in the Hawaiian longline tuna and swordfish fisheries. Side-sets showed the most promise for a bycatch mitigation technique while blue-dyed bait was the least effective at reducing seabird bycatch and shows the least promise of these methods as an effective bycatch mitigation strategy.
Effect on Bycatch: Reduced bycatch but least effective of 3 tested techniques
Reference:
Gilman, E., N. Brothers, and D. Kobayashi, 2003 , Performance Assessment of Underwater Setting Chutes, Side-Setting, and Blue-Dyed Bait to Minimize Seabird Mortality in Hawaii Pelagic Longline Tuna and Swordfish Fisheries

Hawaii

Hooks and Lines
Swordfish and tuna
Side sets
Seabirds Field study in the wild
Summary: Underwater setting chutes, blue-dyed bait, and side-sets each reduced the bycatch of seabirds (Laysan and black-footed albatross and short-tailed shearwater) in the Hawaiian longline tuna and swordfish fisheries. Side-sets showed the most promise for a bycatch mitigation technique while blue-dyed bait was the least effective at reducing seabird bycatch and shows the least promise of these methods as an effective bycatch mitigation strategy.
Effect on Bycatch: Reduced bycatch; most promising of 3 tested techniques
Reference:
Gilman, E., N. Brothers, and D. Kobayashi, 2003 , Performance Assessment of Underwater Setting Chutes, Side-Setting, and Blue-Dyed Bait to Minimize Seabird Mortality in Hawaii Pelagic Longline Tuna and Swordfish Fisheries

Washington State

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
Salmon
Acoustic deterrent devices

Visual deterrents
Seabirds Field study in the wild
Summary: Acoustic pingers reduced the bycatch of the Common Murre (Uria aalge) in the Puget Sound salmon drift gillnet fishery, but they did not reduce bycatch of the rhinoceros auklet (Cerorhinca monocerata). Reduction of target species catch was not significant. White gillnet mesh panels in the upper portion of the net reduce the bycatch of seabirds (Common Murres and Rhinoceros Auklet) in the Puget Sound salmon drift gillnet fishery. Rhinoceros Auklet bycatch was only reduced in 50-mesh visual alert nets. The white mesh panels decreased salmon catch in 50-mesh but not in 20-mesh.
Effect on Bycatch: Variable depending on seabird species
Reference:
Melvin, E.F., J.K. Parrish, and L.L. Conquest, 1999 , Novel tools to reduce seabird bycatch in coastal gillnet fisheries

Washington State

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
Salmon
Acoustic deterrent devices

Visual deterrents
Seabirds Field study in the wild
Summary: Acoustic pingers reduced the bycatch of the Common Murre (Uria aalge) in the Puget Sound salmon drift gillnet fishery, but they did not reduce bycatch of the rhinoceros auklet (Cerorhinca monocerata). Reduction of target species catch was not significant. White gillnet mesh panels in the upper portion of the net reduce the bycatch of seabirds (Common Murres and Rhinoceros Auklet) in the Puget Sound salmon drift gillnet fishery. Rhinoceros Auklet bycatch was only reduced in 50-mesh visual alert nets. The white mesh panels decreased salmon catch in 50-mesh but not in 20-mesh.
Effect on Bycatch: Reduced bycatch but results varied by mesh size
Reference:
Melvin, E.F., J.K. Parrish, and L.L. Conquest, 1999 , Novel tools to reduce seabird bycatch in coastal gillnet fisheries

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • Page 1
  • Current page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »

©2026 Consortium for Wildlife Bycatch Reduction  |  All rights reserved

  • Home
  • About Us
  • What's Bycatch?
    • Species List
  • Database of Publications
    • Bycatch Reduction Techniques Fact Sheets
  • Research Programs
    • Consortium Publications
  • Our Donors and Partners
  • Funding Opportunities
  • Join the Exchange
  • News
  • Events
  • Log in