Skip to main content
Home

 

Register/Add a study

Menu

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Search The Database

Search The Database

Search Database Menu

  • View All Articles
  • Techniques Glossary
  • Fishing Gear Types
  • Add a Study
Displaying 11 - 20 of 21
Location Gear Catch Technique Bycatch species Type Results

Alaska

Hooks and Lines
Pacific halibut
Electromagnetic deterrents
Skates/Rays Field study in the wild
Summary: Rare earth metals (made of cerium mischmetal) were compared with control treatments of standard circle hooks and inert steel above circle hooks on longline fishing gear to determine if bycatch reduction of spiny dogfish could be achieved. Results indicated a slight reduction in dogfish bycatch and a greater reduction in catch of longnose skate on hooks with mischmetal. Problems for using mischmetal commercially include its expense, hazardous nature, and rapid hydrolysis in seawater.
Effect on Bycatch: Experimental hooks resulted in greater reduction on catch of longnose skate
Reference:
Kaimmer, S. M., and A.W. Stoner., 2008 , Field investigation of rare-earth metal as a deterrent to spiny dogfish in the Pacific halibut fishery

Equatorial Atlantic Ocean

Hooks and Lines
Tuna
Circle hooks
Bony Fishes, Skates/Rays, Demochelys coriacea (Leatherback sea turtle) Field study in the wild
Summary:

The effect of circle hooks and J-style hooks on the catch composition, catch rates, hooking location and status of release of target and bycatch species were compared on pelagic longline vessels.  There were significant differences in catch rates between the two hook types for bigeye tuna, which had higher catch rates on circle hooks and sailfish, pelagic stingrays, and leatherback sea turtles, which had higher catch rates on J-style hooks.  Survival of bigeye and yellowfin tunas was significantly higher when circle hooks were used and bigeye and yellowfin tunas, swordfish and sailfish had significantly higher external hookings when circle hooks were used.  The results suggests using 18/0 circle hooks with a zero degree offset could increase the survival of bycatch species while having minimal effects on the catches of target species.

Effect on Bycatch: Sailfish, pelagic stingrays, and leatherback sea turtles, had higher catch rates on J-style hooks
Reference:
Pacheco, J.C., Kerstetter, D.W., Hazin, F.H., Hazin, H., Segundo, R.S.S.L., Graves, J.E., Carvalho, F. and Travassos, P.E., 2011 , A comparison of circle hook and J hook performance in a western equatorial Atlantic Ocean pelagic longline fishery

Equatorial Atlantic Ocean

Hooks and Lines
Tuna
Circle hooks
Bony Fishes, Skates/Rays, Demochelys coriacea (Leatherback sea turtle) Field study in the wild
Summary:

The effect of circle hooks and J-style hooks on the catch composition, catch rates, hooking location and status of release of target and bycatch species were compared on pelagic longline vessels.  There were significant differences in catch rates between the two hook types for bigeye tuna, which had higher catch rates on circle hooks and sailfish, pelagic stingrays, and leatherback sea turtles, which had higher catch rates on J-style hooks.  Survival of bigeye and yellowfin tunas was significantly higher when circle hooks were used and bigeye and yellowfin tunas, swordfish and sailfish had significantly higher external hookings when circle hooks were used.  The results suggests using 18/0 circle hooks with a zero degree offset could increase the survival of bycatch species while having minimal effects on the catches of target species.

Effect on Bycatch: Catch rates were lower for leatherback sea turtles and pelagic stingrays but not sailfish when circle hooks were used
Reference:
Pacheco, J.C., Kerstetter, D.W., Hazin, F.H., Hazin, H., Segundo, R.S.S.L., Graves, J.E., Carvalho, F. and Travassos, P.E., 2011 , A comparison of circle hook and J hook performance in a western equatorial Atlantic Ocean pelagic longline fishery

Natal and Recife, Brazil

Hooks and Lines
Tuna (pelagic longline); Sharks (bottom longline)
Circle hooks
Elasmobranchs, Sharks, Carcharhinus acronotus (Blacknose shark), Carcharhinus falciformis (Silky shark), Carcharhinus longimanus (Oceanic whitetip shark), Ginglymostoma cirratum (Nurse shark), Prionace glauca (Blue shark), Skates/Rays, Hypanus americanus (Southern stingray) Field study in the wild
Summary:

The type (circle 18/0 0 degree offset and J-style 9/0 10 degree offset) and position of hooks in the water column were tested to determine the effects on catch rates and mortality of elasmobranchs in pelagic and bottom longline fisheries in Brazil. Tests were conducted aboard pelagic and bottom longline vessels. Catch per unit effort (CPUE)  for blue shark (Prionace glauca), silky shark (Carcharhinus falciformis) and oceanic whitetip sharks (Carcharhinus longimanus) were significantly higher with circle hooks than with J-style hooks. Silky, blue and oceanic whitetip sharks had a significantly higher mortality at haulback with J-style hooks. Significant differences in hooking location between the two hook types was found for night, blue, silky and oceanic whitetip sharks. These sharks were more commonly hooked externally vs internally.  No significant differences between hook types was found for the CPUE of the sharks on bottom longlines.  Significantly more blacknose sharks (Carcharhinus acronotus) were alive at haulback when circle hooks were used on bottom longlines. Bottom longlines were also used to test for differences in CPUE by fishing depth.  Demersal hooks had significantly higher CPUEs than those suspended in the water column for blacknose sharks, nurse sharks (Ginglymostoma cirratum), and southern stingrays (Hypanus americanus).

Effect on Bycatch: Rates of external hooking were significantly higher with circle hooks
Reference:
Afonso, A., Hazin, F., Carvalho, F., Pacheco, J., Hazin, H., Kerstetter, D., Murie, D., Burgess, G., 2011 , Fishing gear modifications to reduce elasmobranch mortality in pelagic and bottom longline fisheries off Northeast Brazil

Central Mediterranean Sea

Hooks and Lines
Swordfish
Visual deterrents
Skates/Rays Field study in the wild
Summary:

Pelagic stingrays (Pteroplatytrygon violacea) are a common bycatch species in the Mediterranean pelagic longline swordfish fishery. Experimental trials took place in the central Mediterranean Sea from 2005 to 2007 to investigate the importance of bait size, presence and type of light attractors, and hook size and shape on pelagic stingrays. Bait size and light attractants did not have a significant effect on stingray catch rate. Larger J-hooks reduced the stingray capture rate. 16/0 circle hooks had a significantly lower number of stingrays captured than J-hooks, up to 80%

Effect on Bycatch: Light attractants did not have a significant effect on stringray catch rate
Reference:
Piovano, S., S. Clo, and C. Giacoma, 2010 , Reducing longline bycatch: the larger the hook, the fewer the stingrays

Central Mediterranean Sea

Hooks and Lines
Swordfish
Alternative bait
Skates/Rays Field study in the wild
Summary:

Pelagic stingrays (Pteroplatytrygon violacea) are a common bycatch species in the Mediterranean pelagic longline swordfish fishery. Experimental trials took place in the central Mediterranean Sea from 2005 to 2007 to investigate the importance of bait size, presence and type of light attractors, and hook size and shape on pelagic stingrays. Bait size and light attractants did not have a significant effect on stingray catch rate. Larger J-hooks reduced the stingray capture rate. 16/0 circle hooks had a significantly lower number of stingrays captured than J-hooks, up to 80%

Effect on Bycatch: Bait size did not have a significant effect on stingray catch rates
Reference:
Piovano, S., S. Clo, and C. Giacoma, 2010 , Reducing longline bycatch: the larger the hook, the fewer the stingrays

Minch and Stanton Banks

Trawls
Whitefish
Modified ground gear (mobile)
Sharks, Skates/Rays Field study in the wild
Summary:

A study was conducted to determine the impact of removing the 'tickler' from in front of groundgear of trawls. The 'tickler' is a length of chain placed in front of the groundgear of trawl gear, which is supposed to increase catches of sharks and rays. Tests were conducted where the 'tickler' was removed and secondary nets (groundgear bags) were placed behind the groundgear to determine the amount and species of fish that escaped capture. The results indicated that removing the 'tickler' from in front of the groundgear reduced the capture of skates and sharks. Therefore, prohibiting the use of 'tickler' chains in critical habitats for skates and sharks could be a beneficial management tool.

Effect on Bycatch: Removing the 'tickler' chain resulted in decreased catches of sharks and skates
Reference:
Kynoch, R.J., Fryer, R.J. and Neat, F.C., 2015 , A simple technical measure to reduce bycatch and discard of skates and sharks in mixed-species bottom-trawl fisheries

Welsh waters (Cardigan Bay, Anglesey) and Scottish waters (Moray Firth)

UK king scallop (Pecten maximus)
Modified ground gear (mobile)
Skates/Rays, Invertebrates Field study in the wild
Summary:

This study tests the impact of skids placed on scallop dredges in various habitats to reduce seabed impact; skids raise the scallop collecting bag 10-11cm off the seabed. The modified skid dredge caught more marketable scallops per unit area, but also retained more bycatch overall and more undersize scallops. Results were habitat specific.

Effect on Bycatch: increased bycatch
Reference:
Fenton, M., Szostek, C.L., Delargy, A., Johnson, A.F., Kaiser, M.J., Hinz, H., Hold, N., Sciberras, M. , 2024 , Catch yield and selectivity of a modified scallop dredge to reduce seabed impact

Pacific Ocean

Surrounding nets and seine nets
skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis), yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares), bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus)
Excluder devices
Skates/Rays Field study in the wild
Summary:

A mobuilid sorting grid placed over the hopper used to sort bycatch on tuna purse seine vessels aided in the release of larger mobuilid rays without increasing handling time.  

Effect on Bycatch: Of the 21 individuals released during the study, use of sorting grid allowed fishers to release larger mobuilids without increasing handling time.
Reference:
Cronin, M.R., Murua, J., Croll, D.A., Hutchinson, M., Lezama-Ochoa, N., Lopez, J., Murua, H., Palacios, M.D., Restrepo, V., Stewart, J.D., Swimmer, Y., Zilliacus, K.M., and G. Moreno, 2025 , Evidence for a fisher-designed solution to manta and devil ray bycatch in tuna fisheries

Gulf of California, Mexico

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
Variety of bony fish, including spotted sand bass (Paralabrax maculatofasciatus) and California halibut ( Paralichthys californicus)
Visual deterrents
Bony Fishes, Juvenile/Non-target fishes (not specified to species level), Elasmobranchs, Sharks, Skates/Rays Field study in the wild
Summary:

Elasmobranch bycatch significantly decreased in bottom-set gillnets in the Gulf of California using orange LEDs, ultraviolet LEDs, green LEDs, and green glow sticks, with orange LEDs being the most effective at reducing bycatch. As a whole, catch of bony fish was not affected by illumination, although responses were taxonomic-specific.  

Effect on Bycatch: Decrease in elasmobranch bycatch ranging from 24-55%, with orange LEDs most effective at reducing bycatch.
Reference:
Burgher KM, Wang J, Barkan J, Swimmer Y, Senko, JF, 2026 , Artificial light reduces elasmobranch bycatch in gillnets across multiple wavelengths and taxonomic groups.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • Page 1
  • Current page 2
  • Page 3
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »

©2026 Consortium for Wildlife Bycatch Reduction  |  All rights reserved

  • Home
  • About Us
  • What's Bycatch?
    • Species List
  • Database of Publications
    • Bycatch Reduction Techniques Fact Sheets
  • Research Programs
    • Consortium Publications
  • Our Donors and Partners
  • Funding Opportunities
  • Join the Exchange
  • News
  • Events
  • Log in