Skip to main content
Home

 

Register/Add a study

Menu

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Search The Database

Search The Database

Search Database Menu

  • View All Articles
  • Techniques Glossary
  • Fishing Gear Types
  • Add a Study
Displaying 21 - 30 of 84
Location Gear Catch Technique Bycatch species Type Results

Canada

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
Multiple species
Metal oxide/barium sulfate nets
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise), Seabirds Field study in the wild
Summary: Metal oxide nets containing barium sulphate (that increased their acoustic reflectivity and probably also their stiffness) reduced the bycatch of harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) in an eastern Canada demersal gillnet fishery. No difference in catch of commercial fish species, including cod, pollock, haddock, and spiny dogfish, was observed between the nylon and barium sulphate nets. Metal oxide nets reduced the bycatch of greater shearwater (Puffinus gravis) in an eastern Canada demersal gillnet fishery, probably by increasing the visibility of the blue-dyed nets to the birds.
Effect on Bycatch: Reduced harbor porpoise bycatch
Reference:
Trippel, E.A., N.L. Holy, D.L. Palka, T.D. Shepherd, G.D. Melvin, and J.M. Terhune, 2003 , Nylon barium sulphate gillnet reduces porpoise and seabird mortality

Canada

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
Multiple species
Metal oxide/barium sulfate nets
Seabirds Field study in the wild
Summary: Metal oxide nets containing barium sulphate (that increased their acoustic reflectivity and probably also their stiffness) reduced the bycatch of harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) in an eastern Canada demersal gillnet fishery. No difference in catch of commercial fish species, including cod, pollock, haddock, and spiny dogfish, was observed between the nylon and barium sulphate nets. Metal oxide nets reduced the bycatch of greater shearwater (Puffinus gravis) in an eastern Canada demersal gillnet fishery, probably by increasing the visibility of the blue-dyed nets to the birds.
Effect on Bycatch: Reduced bycatch
Reference:
Trippel, E.A., N.L. Holy, D.L. Palka, T.D. Shepherd, G.D. Melvin, and J.M. Terhune, 2003 , Nylon barium sulphate gillnet reduces porpoise and seabird mortality

South Africa

Hooks and Lines
Patagonian toothfish
Sub-surface sets (gillnets)
Seabirds Field study in the wild
Summary: An underwater setting funnel, used in conjunction with a bird-scaring line, reduced bycatch of albatross and petrel seabirds in the demersal longline fishery for Patagonian toothfish (Dissostichus eleginoides) off of the sub-Antarctic South African Prince Edward Islands. Although fish rates were not compared between sets with and without the funnel, it is predicted fish catch would improve with the use of the funnels as fishing would be permitted during the day in addition to current nighttime fishing.
Effect on Bycatch: Reduced bycatch
Reference:
Ryan, P.G. and B.P. Watkins, 2002 , Reducing incidental mortality of seabirds with an underwater longline setting funnel

New Zealand

Trawls
Swordfish
Bird-scaring devices
Seabirds Field study in the wild
Summary: Streamers added to the warp line of trawl gear reduce bycatch of seabirds attempting to feed on or near trawl fishing gear.
Effect on Bycatch: Reduced bycatch

Argentina

Trawls
Hake
Bird-scaring devices
Seabirds Field study in the wild
Summary: A warp cable modification (plastic cone attached to each warp cable) reduced seabird bycatch in the high-sea Argentine hake (Merluccius hubbsi) trawl fishery. The two most abundantly captured seabirds prior to the attachment of plastic cones were the Kelp gull (Larus dominicanus) and the Black-browed albatross (Thalassarche melanophrys).
Effect on Bycatch: Reduced bycatch
Reference:
Gonzalez-Zevallos, D., P. and Yorio, G. Caille, 2007 , Seabird mortality at trawler warp cables and a proposed mitigation measure: A case study in Golfo San Jorge, Patagonia, Argentina

New Zealand

Hooks and Lines
Snapper
Noxious bait
Seabirds Field study in the wild
Summary: School shark (Galeorhinus galeus) liver oil dripped behind fishing vessels in the northern New Zealand snapper (Pagrus auratus) longline fishery reduced seabird numbers and dives on baits when compared to canola oil and seawater control treatments. The shark liver oil did not affect the number of target snapper, gurnard (Chelidonicthys kumu), kaha-wai (Arripis trutta), or trevally (Pseudocaranx dentex) caught.
Effect on Bycatch: Reduced interactions
Reference:
Pierre, J.P. and W.S. Norden, 2006 , Reducing seabird bycatch in longline fisheries using a natural olfactory deterrent

Falkan Islands

Trawls
Swordfish
Bird-scaring devices
Seabirds Field study in the wild
Summary: Three seabird bycatch mitigation measures, tori lines, warp scarer, and Brady baffler, were tested on trawlers and compared with a control treatment of no mitigation measure. Each mitigation measure reduced seabird mortalities; however, the tori lines, followed by the warp scarer, were much more effective at reducing seabird contact with fishing gear than the Brady baffler.
Effect on Bycatch: Reduced bycatch
Reference:
Sullivan, B.J., P. Brickle, T.A. Reid, D.G. Bone, and D.A.J. Middleton, 2006 , Mitigation of seabird mortality on factory trawlers: trials of three devices to reduce warp cable strikes

Hooks and Lines
Deep sets
Seabirds Field study in the wild

Norway

Hooks and Lines
Torsk (Brosme brosme), ling (Molva molva) and haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus)
Bird-scaring devices
Seabirds Field study in the wild
Summary: Bird-scaring lines, underwater setting and line shooters all reduced the incidental capture of seabirds, with bird-scaring lines being the most effective. These mitigation measures also reduced bait loss and increased the catch rates of target species.
Effect on Bycatch: Reduced incidental capture of seabirds, mostly fulmars
Reference:
Lokkeborg, S., 2003 , Review and evaluation of three mitigation measures-bird-scaring line, underwater setting and line shooter-to reduce seabird bycatch in the north Atlantic longline fishery

Norway

Hooks and Lines
Torsk (Brosme brosme), ling (Molva molva) and haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus)
Sub-surface sets (gillnets)
Seabirds Field study in the wild
Summary: Bird-scaring lines, underwater setting and line shooters all reduced the incidental capture of seabirds, with bird-scaring lines being the most effective. These mitigation measures also reduced bait loss and increased the catch rates of target species.
Effect on Bycatch: Reduced incidental capture of seabirds, mostly fulmars
Reference:
Lokkeborg, S., 2003 , Review and evaluation of three mitigation measures-bird-scaring line, underwater setting and line shooter-to reduce seabird bycatch in the north Atlantic longline fishery

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Current page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »

©2026 Consortium for Wildlife Bycatch Reduction  |  All rights reserved

  • Home
  • About Us
  • What's Bycatch?
    • Species List
  • Database of Publications
    • Bycatch Reduction Techniques Fact Sheets
  • Research Programs
    • Consortium Publications
  • Our Donors and Partners
  • Funding Opportunities
  • Join the Exchange
  • News
  • Events
  • Log in