Search The Database
| Location | Gear | Catch | Technique | Bycatch species | Type | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bay of Fundy |
Gillnets and Entangling Nets
|
Atlantic cod, Atlantic herring, pollock | Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise) | Field study in the wild | Field testing was conducted in the lower Bay of Fundy during 1996 and 1997 to determine the effectiveness of acoustic alarms (Netmark 1000) in reducing bycatch rates of harbor porpoises in gillnets. Alarms were spaced 100 m apart along the gillnet float-line. There was a 77% reduction in bycatch of harbor porpoises in nets equipped with alarms compared to those with no alarms. There were no significant differences in catch rates of target species, Atlantic cod, Atlantic herring and pollock. There was a 77% reduction in porpoise bycatch when acoustic alarms were used. |
|
Eastern Pacific Ocean, United States |
Trawls
|
Tuna (primarily Thunnus albacares) |
Small mesh size
|
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise) | Field study in the wild | The impact of Medina panels attached to tuna purse seine nets operating in the US fishery was investigating for their effect on porpoise mortality. Medina panels are reduced mesh size netting hung from 2-inch mesh webbing on the purse seine. The authors took measurements of penetration of porpoise snouts and flippers through mesh openings of 2, 1 7/8, 1 1/2 and 1 inch to determine the potential reduction in porpoise entanglements. Even the smallest-sized porpoise could not fit its snout through the 1 inch panel, even with its mouth closed. Recent tests of porpoise 'aprons' and 'chutes' could be promising in making these small mesh panels compatible with tuna purse seine performance. Porpoises could not get their snout through 1 inch mesh panel. |
Black Sea, Turkey |
Gillnets and Entangling Nets
|
Turbot (Psetta maxima) |
Acoustic deterrent devices
|
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise) | Field study in the wild | The experiment evaluated the effectiveness of two types of pingers (Aquamark 100 and Aquamark 200) to reduce the bycatch rate of harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) in a set gillnet fishery in the Black Sea. The study also evaluated the effects of the pingers on catch of target and non-target fish species. There was no significant difference in catch of target and non-target fish species in trials with pingers versus control sets. There was also no significant difference between number of harbor porpoises caught in nets using pingers and when no pingers were used, although a low overall number of porpoises were caught (eight harbor porpoises were caught during the experiment – three in control nets, three in nets using the Aquamark 100, and one in nets using the Aquamark 200). |
Western Baltic Sea |
Gillnets and Entangling Nets
|
Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) |
Passive acoustic deterrents
|
Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise) | Field study in the wild | Pearl Nets, a passive acoustic deterrent, were tested in commercial gillnet fisheries in the Western Baltic Sea. Compared to a control, the Peal Nets reduced harbor porpoise bycatch and maintained target catch rate for Atlantic cod. |
Black Sea |
Gillnets and Entangling Nets
|
turbot (Scophthalmus spp) | Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise) | Field study in the wild | This study investigated harbor porpoise bycatch in bottom gillnets and trammel nets targeting turbot (Scophthalmus spp.) in the Black Sea between 2019-2021 via independent observers, questionnaires and stranding data. Cetaceans were caught on 55% of trips, and most were harbour porpoises. The study confirmed that bycatch is the most serious and immediate threat to the Black Sea harbour porpoises, with as many as 16,200 individuals caught annually. Bycatch rates showed seasonal variation with marked increase in summer, compared to spring. Total annual bycatch of harbour seals in Black Sea estimated to be between 11,826 and 16 200 individuals. |
|
Iceland |
Gillnets and Entangling Nets
|
Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) |
Acoustic deterrent devices
|
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise) | Field study in the wild | Three types of acoustic deterrent devices were tested in the Icelandic cod gillnet fishery: Fishtek Banana pingers, Porpoise ALert devices (PAL), and wideband PAL (wPAL) with a modified pinger signal (PAL device emitting a wideband pinger signal with a frequency range of 20 – 160 kHz and signal duration of 0.3 s (every 4–30 s) with the same source level at 145 db and maximum depth (320 m)). Banana pingers and PALs did not demonstrate any reduction of bycatch of marine mammals, while the wPAL-equipped nets had no bycatch during the trial. Fish catch and overall commercial value was significantly reduced in gillnets equipped with banana pingers and PALs. Use of banana pingers and porpoise alert devices (PALs) had roughly the same rates of bycatch as the control, while wideband PALs did not record any marine mammal bycatch (control = 14 marine mammals). |
Black Sea, Bulgaria |
Gillnets and Entangling Nets
|
Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) |
Acoustic deterrent devices
|
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise) | Field study in the wild | Between 2019 and 2022, trials using three different pinger models (Future Oceans 10 kHz, Future Oceans 70 kHz, and PAL Wideband) were conducted in Bulgaria during standard turbot fishing operations. Marine mammal bycatch was observed in 61% of all hauls. No significant difference in bycatch rates between active and control nets was observed in trials involving Future Oceans 10 kHz (17 trials) and 70 kHz (6 trials) pingers. However, a significant reduction (74%) in cetacean bycatch was recorded during the trials conducted with PAL Wideband pingers. Future Oceans 10kHz and Future Oceans 70kHz pingers did not significantly impact bycatch; PAL Wideband resulted in a 74% reduction in cetacean bycatch |