Search The Database
Displaying 1 - 10 of 53
| Location | Gear | Catch | Technique | Bycatch species | Type | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bahamas |
Hooks and Lines
|
shrimp | Sharks | Field study in the wild | Magnets placed above hooks on longline gear created a strong magnetic field to reduce bycatch of nurse, lemon, and 4 additional shark species. Reduced bycatch |
|
off Hawaii |
Hooks and Lines
|
Swordfish |
Alternative bait
|
Sharks | Field study in the wild | To reduce turtle interactions, regulations for the Hawaii-based longline swordfish fishery required vessels to switch from using a J-shaped hook with squid bait to a wider circle-shaped hook with fish bait. Analyses of observer data showed that, following the introduction of the regulations, significant and large reductions in sea turtle and shark capture rates occurred without compromising target species catches. There was also a highly significant reduction in the proportion of turtles that swallowed hooks and a highly significant increase in the proportion of caught turtles that were released after removal of all terminal tackle. Research suggests that turtles aggregate at foraging grounds and that instituting methods to avoid real-time turtle bycatch hotspots may further reduce turtle interactions. |
Hawaii |
Hooks and Lines
|
Tuna and swordfish |
Deep sets
|
Sharks, Skates/Rays | Field study in the wild | Longlines were set at depths greater than 100m using weighted lines to reduce bycatch of recreationally important fish species and protected species such as seabirds and sea turtles. While bigeye tuna catch rates were consistent between control and experimental sets, bycatch rates increased for sickle pomfret and opah but decreased for wahoo, dolphinfish, blue and striped marlin, and shortbill species. These species are generally not targeted but retained for their commercial value. Bycatch of sharks and pelagic stingrays did not differ between the experimental and control sets. No differences in catches between experimental and control sets |
Alaska |
Hooks and Lines
|
Pacific halibut |
Electromagnetic deterrents
|
Sharks | Field study in the wild | Rare earth metals (made of cerium mischmetal) were compared with control treatments of standard circle hooks and inert steel above circle hooks on longline fishing gear to determine if bycatch reduction of spiny dogfish could be achieved. Results indicated a slight reduction in dogfish bycatch and a greater reduction in catch of longnose skate on hooks with mischmetal. Problems for using mischmetal commercially include its expense, hazardous nature, and rapid hydrolysis in seawater. Slightly reduced bycatch of spiny dogfish |
North Carolina, USA |
Gillnets and Entangling Nets
|
Spanish mackerel and spot |
Tensioning gillnet
|
Sharks | Field study in the wild | The potential of modifying gillnets to reduce shark bycatch was investigated in the US Spanish mackerel and spot gillnet fisheries. The modified net had larger floats on the head-rope and inreased weight on the lead-line to increase the tension of the net. Results showed that the catch rate of some shark species was significantly reduced in the modified gillnets. Target catch rates of Spanish mackerel did not differ significantly between control and modified nets of the same mesh size. Significantly reduced bycatch of some shark species |
Eastern Tropical Pacific Ocean |
Surrounding nets and seine nets
|
Tuna |
Time area closures
|
Sharks | Summary study | Bycatch—the incidental catch of nontarget species—is a principal concern in marine conservation
and fisheries management. In the eastern Pacific Ocean tuna fishery, a large fraction of nonmammal bycatch is captured by purse-seine gear when nets are deployed around floating objects. We examined the spatial distribution of a dominant species in this fishery’s bycatch, the apex predator silky shark (Carcharhinus falciformis), from 1994 to 2005 to determine whether spatial closures, areas where fishing is prohibited, might effectively reduce the bycatch of this species. We then identified candidate locations for fishery closures that specifically considered the trade-off between bycatch reduction and the loss of tuna catch and evaluated ancillary conservation benefits to less commonly captured taxa. Smoothed spatial distributions of silky shark bycatch did not indicate persistent small areas of especially high bycatch for any size class of shark over the 12-year period. Nevertheless, bycatch of small silky sharks (<90 cm total length) was consistently higher north of the equator during all years. On the basis of this distribution, we evaluated nearly 100 candidate closure areas between 5◦N and 15◦ N that could have reduced, by as much as 33%, the total silky shark bycatch while compromising only 12% of the tuna catch. Although silky sharks are the predominant species of elasmobranchs caught as bycatch in this fishery, closures also suggested reductions in the bycatch of other vulnerable taxa, including other shark species and turtles. Our technique provides an effective method with which to balance the costs and benefits of conservation in fisheries management. Spatial closures are a viable management tool, but implementation should be preceded by careful consideration of the consequences of fishing reallocation. |
Northeastern Australia |
Hooks and Lines
|
Bigeye and yellowfin tuna |
Alternative leader design
|
Sharks | Field study in the wild | Catch rates of blue marlin, snake mackerel and sharks were lower when nylon monofilament leaders, instead of wire leaders, were used on pelagic longline gear but bigeye tuna and black marlin catch rates increased. (No effect on yellowfin). Nylon leaders also had higher bite-off rates than the wire leaders. Wire leaders had higher catch rates of sharks when compared to nylon monofilament leaders |
North Pacific, Japan |
Hooks and Lines
|
Swordfish |
Circle hooks
|
Sharks | Field study in the wild | The use of circle hooks (4.3 sun and 5.2 sun) instead of standard Japanese tuna hooks (3.8 sun) on pelagic longlines, had little impact on catch rates, mortality or size composition of blue sharks. Little effect on catch rates, mortality or size composition |
Western Australia |
Trawls
|
Red emperor, scarlet perch, spangled emperor, Rankin cod, blue spot emperor, rosy threadfin brea, flagfish, frypan snapper, red snapper and goldband snapper |
Excluder devices
|
Sharks | Field study in the wild | A semi-flexible exclusion grid with a bar spacing of 15.5 cm reduced dolphin bycatch in the Pilbara trawl fishery by close to 50% and reduced the bycatch of sea turtles, large sharks and rays. However, the fate of the dolphins that encountered the grid and escaped is unknown. Reduced capture of sharks larger than 100 cm with largest reductions occuring at lengths greater than 180 cm |
North Carolina |
Gillnets and Entangling Nets
|
Spanish mackerel, menhaden, spot |
Tensioning gillnet
|
Sharks | Field study in the wild | Gillnets with three difference mesh sizes (2 7/8", 3" and 4") were modified to use 200 lbs/200 yard lead line and 11 oz buoyancy floats (versus 50lbs/200 yard lead line and 3 oz floats) to increase the tension in the net. Catch rates of Atlantic sharpnose and bonnethead sharks were significantly lower in the 4" modified net. The proportion of hammer-wrapped bonnethead sharks was significantly higher in the 4" unmodified net and significantly less blacktip sharks were wrapped in the 3" modified net. Selectivity of blacknose sharks varied between the modified and unmodified nets. Catch rates of targeted Spanish mackerel and spot were not significantly different between modified and unmodified nets. Catch rates of bonnethead sharks were significantly lower in the 4" modified net |