Skip to main content
Home

 

Register/Add a study

Menu

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Search The Database

Search The Database

Search Database Menu

  • View All Articles
  • Techniques Glossary
  • Fishing Gear Types
  • Add a Study
Displaying 1 - 10 of 53
Location Gear Catch Technique Bycatch species Type Results

Bahamas

Hooks and Lines
shrimp Sharks Field study in the wild
Summary: Magnets placed above hooks on longline gear created a strong magnetic field to reduce bycatch of nurse, lemon, and 4 additional shark species.
Effect on Bycatch: Reduced bycatch

off Hawaii

Hooks and Lines
Swordfish
Alternative bait
Sharks Field study in the wild
Summary: To reduce turtle interactions, regulations for the Hawaii-based longline swordfish fishery required vessels to switch from using a J-shaped hook with squid bait to a wider circle-shaped hook with fish bait. Analyses of observer data showed that, following the introduction of the regulations, significant and large reductions in sea turtle and shark capture rates occurred without compromising target species catches. There was also a highly significant reduction in the proportion of turtles that swallowed hooks and a highly significant increase in the proportion of caught turtles that were released after removal of all terminal tackle. Research suggests that turtles aggregate at foraging grounds and that instituting methods to avoid real-time turtle bycatch hotspots may further reduce turtle interactions.
Effect on Bycatch: Decreased by 36%
Reference:
Gilman, E., D. Kobayashi, T. Swenarton, N. Brothers, P. Dalzell, and I. Kinan-Kelly, 2007 , Reducing sea turtle interactions in the Hawaii-based longline swordfish fishery

Hawaii

Hooks and Lines
Tuna and swordfish
Deep sets
Sharks, Skates/Rays Field study in the wild
Summary: Longlines were set at depths greater than 100m using weighted lines to reduce bycatch of recreationally important fish species and protected species such as seabirds and sea turtles. While bigeye tuna catch rates were consistent between control and experimental sets, bycatch rates increased for sickle pomfret and opah but decreased for wahoo, dolphinfish, blue and striped marlin, and shortbill species. These species are generally not targeted but retained for their commercial value. Bycatch of sharks and pelagic stingrays did not differ between the experimental and control sets.
Effect on Bycatch: No differences in catches between experimental and control sets
Reference:
Beverly, S., D. Curran, M. Musyl, and B. Molony., 2008 , Effects of eliminating shallow hooks from tuna longline sets on target and non-target species in the Hawaii-based pelagic tuna fishery

Alaska

Hooks and Lines
Pacific halibut
Electromagnetic deterrents
Sharks Field study in the wild
Summary: Rare earth metals (made of cerium mischmetal) were compared with control treatments of standard circle hooks and inert steel above circle hooks on longline fishing gear to determine if bycatch reduction of spiny dogfish could be achieved. Results indicated a slight reduction in dogfish bycatch and a greater reduction in catch of longnose skate on hooks with mischmetal. Problems for using mischmetal commercially include its expense, hazardous nature, and rapid hydrolysis in seawater.
Effect on Bycatch: Slightly reduced bycatch of spiny dogfish
Reference:
Kaimmer, S. M., and A.W. Stoner., 2008 , Field investigation of rare-earth metal as a deterrent to spiny dogfish in the Pacific halibut fishery

North Carolina, USA

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
Spanish mackerel and spot
Tensioning gillnet
Sharks Field study in the wild
Summary: The potential of modifying gillnets to reduce shark bycatch was investigated in the US Spanish mackerel and spot gillnet fisheries. The modified net had larger floats on the head-rope and inreased weight on the lead-line to increase the tension of the net. Results showed that the catch rate of some shark species was significantly reduced in the modified gillnets. Target catch rates of Spanish mackerel did not differ significantly between control and modified nets of the same mesh size.
Effect on Bycatch: Significantly reduced bycatch of some shark species
Reference:
Thorpe, T. and Frierson, D, 2009 , Bycatch mitigation assessment for sharks caught in coastal anchored gillnets

Eastern Tropical Pacific Ocean

Surrounding nets and seine nets
Tuna
Time area closures
Sharks Summary study
Summary: Bycatch—the incidental catch of nontarget species—is a principal concern in marine conservation and fisheries management. In the eastern Pacific Ocean tuna fishery, a large fraction of nonmammal bycatch is captured by purse-seine gear when nets are deployed around floating objects. We examined the spatial distribution of a dominant species in this fishery’s bycatch, the apex predator silky shark (Carcharhinus falciformis), from 1994 to 2005 to determine whether spatial closures, areas where fishing is prohibited, might effectively reduce the bycatch of this species. We then identified candidate locations for fishery closures that specifically considered the trade-off between bycatch reduction and the loss of tuna catch and evaluated ancillary conservation benefits to less commonly captured taxa. Smoothed spatial distributions of silky shark bycatch did not indicate persistent small areas of especially high bycatch for any size class of shark over the 12-year period. Nevertheless, bycatch of small silky sharks (<90 cm total length) was consistently higher north of the equator during all years. On the basis of this distribution, we evaluated nearly 100 candidate closure areas between 5◦N and 15◦ N that could have reduced, by as much as 33%, the total silky shark bycatch while compromising only 12% of the tuna catch. Although silky sharks are the predominant species of elasmobranchs caught as bycatch in this fishery, closures also suggested reductions in the bycatch of other vulnerable taxa, including other shark species and turtles. Our technique provides an effective method with which to balance the costs and benefits of conservation in fisheries management. Spatial closures are a viable management tool, but implementation should be preceded by careful consideration of the consequences of fishing reallocation.
Reference:
Watson, J., T. Essington, C. Lennert-Cody, and M. Hall, 2008 , Trade-offs in the Design of Fishery Closures: Management of Silky Shark Bycatch in the Eastern Pacific Ocean Tuna Fishery

Northeastern Australia

Hooks and Lines
Bigeye and yellowfin tuna
Alternative leader design
Sharks Field study in the wild
Summary: Catch rates of blue marlin, snake mackerel and sharks were lower when nylon monofilament leaders, instead of wire leaders, were used on pelagic longline gear but bigeye tuna and black marlin catch rates increased. (No effect on yellowfin). Nylon leaders also had higher bite-off rates than the wire leaders.
Effect on Bycatch: Wire leaders had higher catch rates of sharks when compared to nylon monofilament leaders
Reference:
Ward, P., Lawrence, E., Darbyshire, R. and Hindmarsh, S., 2008 , Large-scale experiment shows that nylon leaders reduce shark bycatch and benefit pelagic longline fisheries

North Pacific, Japan

Hooks and Lines
Swordfish
Circle hooks
Sharks Field study in the wild
Summary: The use of circle hooks (4.3 sun and 5.2 sun) instead of standard Japanese tuna hooks (3.8 sun) on pelagic longlines, had little impact on catch rates, mortality or size composition of blue sharks.
Effect on Bycatch: Little effect on catch rates, mortality or size composition
Reference:
Yokota, K., Kiyota, M., Minami, H., 2006 , Shark catch in pelagic longline fishery: Comparison of circle and tuna hooks

Western Australia

Trawls
Red emperor, scarlet perch, spangled emperor, Rankin cod, blue spot emperor, rosy threadfin brea, flagfish, frypan snapper, red snapper and goldband snapper
Excluder devices
Sharks Field study in the wild
Summary: A semi-flexible exclusion grid with a bar spacing of 15.5 cm reduced dolphin bycatch in the Pilbara trawl fishery by close to 50% and reduced the bycatch of sea turtles, large sharks and rays. However, the fate of the dolphins that encountered the grid and escaped is unknown.
Effect on Bycatch: Reduced capture of sharks larger than 100 cm with largest reductions occuring at lengths greater than 180 cm
Reference:
Stephenson, P.C., Wells, S., King, J.A., 2008 , Evaluation of exclusion grids to reduce the bycatch of dolphins, turtles, sharks and rays in the Pilbara trawl fishery

North Carolina

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
Spanish mackerel, menhaden, spot
Tensioning gillnet
Sharks Field study in the wild
Summary:

Gillnets with three difference mesh sizes (2 7/8", 3" and 4") were modified to use 200 lbs/200 yard lead line and 11 oz buoyancy floats (versus 50lbs/200 yard lead line and 3 oz floats) to increase the tension in the net. Catch rates of Atlantic sharpnose and bonnethead sharks were significantly lower in the 4" modified net. The proportion of hammer-wrapped bonnethead sharks was significantly higher in the 4" unmodified net and significantly less blacktip sharks were wrapped in the 3" modified net. Selectivity of blacknose sharks varied between the modified and unmodified nets. Catch rates of targeted Spanish mackerel and spot were not significantly different between modified and unmodified nets.

Effect on Bycatch: Catch rates of bonnethead sharks were significantly lower in the 4" modified net
Reference:
Thorpe, T., Pabst, D.A., Beresoff, D. , 2001 , Assessment of modified gillnets as a means to reduce bycatch in southeastern North Carolina coastal waters

Pagination

  • Current page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »

©2026 Consortium for Wildlife Bycatch Reduction  |  All rights reserved

  • Home
  • About Us
  • What's Bycatch?
    • Species List
  • Database of Publications
    • Bycatch Reduction Techniques Fact Sheets
  • Research Programs
    • Consortium Publications
  • Our Donors and Partners
  • Funding Opportunities
  • Join the Exchange
  • News
  • Events
  • Log in