Skip to main content
Home

 

Register/Add a study

Menu

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Search The Database

Search The Database

Search Database Menu

  • View All Articles
  • Techniques Glossary
  • Fishing Gear Types
  • Add a Study
Displaying 141 - 150 of 568
Location Gear Catch Technique Bycatch species Type Results

North Pacific, Japan

Hooks-and-Lines
Swordfish
Circle hooks
Sharks Field study in the wild
Summary: The use of circle hooks (4.3 sun and 5.2 sun) instead of standard Japanese tuna hooks (3.8 sun) on pelagic longlines, had little impact on catch rates, mortality or size composition of blue sharks.
Effect on Bycatch: Little effect on catch rates, mortality or size composition
Reference:
Yokota, K., Kiyota, M., Minami, H., 2006 , Shark catch in pelagic longline fishery: Comparison of circle and tuna hooks

Northern Australia

Trawls
Prawns
Excluder devices
Invertebrates Field study in the wild
Summary:

The catches from five experimental trawls (TED + fisheye BRD, upward facing TED, downward facing TED, bigeye BRD and square-mesh panel BRD) were compared to those of the standard twin Florida Flyer prawn trawl. Nets with a combination of a TED and BRD reduced sea turtle catches by 100%, large sponges by 85.3%, sharks by 36.3% and rays by 17.7% and reduced the proportion of soft and damaged prawns by 41.6% and catches of tiger prawns by 6.5%. Upward and downward facing TED's reduced sea turtle bycatch by 99% and 100% respectively and large sponges by 81.6% and 95.9% respectively. Catches of tiger prawns were reduced by 6.3% with the use of TED's. The BRD's had little impact on the catch of either the target or bycatch species.

Effect on Bycatch: Reduced large sponge catches by 85.3%
Reference:
Brewer, D., Heales, D., Milton, D., Dell, Q., Fry, G., Venables, B., Jones, P., 2006 , The impact of turtle excluder devices and bycatch reduction devices on diverse tropical marine communities in Australia's northern prawn trawl fishery

Northern Australia

Trawls
Prawns
Excluder devices
Sea Turtles Field study in the wild
Summary:

The catches from five experimental trawls (TED + fisheye BRD, upward facing TED, downward facing TED, bigeye BRD and square-mesh panel BRD) were compared to those of the standard twin Florida Flyer prawn trawl. Nets with a combination of a TED and BRD reduced sea turtle catches by 100%, large sponges by 85.3%, sharks by 36.3% and rays by 17.7% and reduced the proportion of soft and damaged prawns by 41.6% and catches of tiger prawns by 6.5%. Upward and downward facing TED's reduced sea turtle bycatch by 99% and 100% respectively and large sponges by 81.6% and 95.9% respectively. Catches of tiger prawns were reduced by 6.3% with the use of TED's. The BRD's had little impact on the catch of either the target or bycatch species.

Effect on Bycatch: Reduced sea turtle catches by 100%
Reference:
Brewer, D., Heales, D., Milton, D., Dell, Q., Fry, G., Venables, B., Jones, P., 2006 , The impact of turtle excluder devices and bycatch reduction devices on diverse tropical marine communities in Australia's northern prawn trawl fishery

Southern Brazil

Hooks-and-Lines
Swordfish, blue sharks
Bird-scaring devices
Seabirds Field study in the wild
Summary: The use of light torilines (made with nylon monofilament branch lines and streamers made from other light material) on pelagic longlines reduced the incidental capture of seabirds by 64%. The capture of target species, including swordfish and blue sharks, was increased by 32% and 15.1% respectively when light torilines were used.
Effect on Bycatch: Reduced incidental capture of seabirds by 64%
Reference:
Mancini, P.L., Bugoni, L., Neves, T., Monteiro, D.S., Estima, S.C., 2009 , The effect of light toriline on seabird by-catch and fish catch rates in the pelagic longline fishery off southern Brazil

Florida

Trawls
Shrimp
Excluder devices
Bony Fishes Field study in the wild
Summary: The extended mesh funnel (EMF) and Florida fisheye (FFE) bycatch reduction devices (BRD) were evaluated in otter trawls with three different sized openings (circumference = 14 m, 17 m, and 20 m). The mean ratio of finfish bycatch to shrimp in nets equipped with BRD's was substantially lower but not significantly different than the ratios in the control nets. The biomass and number of finfish was lower and significantly different in nets equipped with the BRD's compared to the control nets except in the winter, and the catch per unit effort of finfish was always lower in the nets equipped with the BRD's. The number and biomass of shrimp was not reduced in the 17 m or 20 m nets equipped with the BRD's and differences in the catch per unit effort of shrimp between nets with the BRD's and the control net varied by season and net size.
Effect on Bycatch: Reduced the biomass and number of finfish and the catch per unit effort
Reference:
Steele, P., Bert, T.M., Johnston, K.H., Levett, S. , 2002 , Efficiency of bycatch reduction devices in small otter trawls used in the Florida shrimp fishery

Florida

Trawls
Shrimp
Excluder devices
Bony Fishes Field study in the wild
Summary: The Florida fisheye (FFE) bycatch reduction device was tested in a skimmer trawl fishery in Florida. Trawls equipped with the FFE had significantly lower finfish bycatch than the control nets but there was no difference in the quantity of shrimp caught between the two nets. The amount of reduction in finfish bycatch in the FFE equipped nets did vary by season and among fish species.
Effect on Bycatch: Bycatch of finfish was reduced
Reference:
Warner, D.A., McMillen-Jackson, A.L., Bert, T.M., Crawford, C.R., 2004 , The efficiency of a bycatch reduction device used in skimmer trawls in the Florida shrimp fishery

New South Wales, Australia

Trawls
Prawns
Excluder devices
Bony Fishes Field study in the wild
Summary:

Codends modified with rectangular mesh panels (one oriented length-wise in the cod end and one oriented width-wise, each measuring 7 x 11 bars) reduced the weight of discarded bycatch by 46% and 38% respectively but did not significantly reduce the catch of targeted prawns. A haulback delay of 10-15 seconds allowed juvenile red spot to escape through the square mesh panels, while trawls with no delay showed no significant reduction in the bycatch of this species.

Effect on Bycatch: Reduced the overall weight of bycatch by 46% when mesh panels were oriented vertically
Reference:
Broadhurst, M.K., Kennelly, S.J., O'Doherty, G., 1996 , Effects of square-mesh panels in codends and of haulback delay on bycatch reduction in the oceanic prawn-trawl fishery of New South Wales, Australia

Akaroa Harbour, New Zealand

Gillnets
None reported
Acoustic deterrent devices
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters) Field study in the wild
Summary:

White Dukane pingers with a fundamental frequency of 10kHz and harmonies of up to 160 kHz, elicited the strongest response from Hector's dolphins, compared to the black Pice and red Dukane pingers. More than half (62.5%) of the dolphins exhibited avoidance when exposed to the white pinger. However, no significant differences between pingers were found in the rate of echolocation clicks per dolphin or dolphin group, or among the peak frequencies of subset clicks.

Effect on Bycatch: 62.5% of individuals elicited avoidance behavior (using white Dukane pingers)
Reference:
Stone, G.S., Cavagnaro, L., Hutt, A., Kraus, S., Baldwin, K., Brown, J., 2000 , Reactions of Hector's dolphins to acoustic gillnet pingers

New South Wales, Australia

Trawls
Prawns
Excluder devices
Bony Fishes Field study in the wild
Summary:

Codends modified with rectangular mesh panels (one oriented length-wise in the cod end and one oriented width-wise, each measuring 7 x 11 bars) reduced the weight of discarded bycatch by 46% and 38% respectively but did not significantly reduce the catch of targeted prawns. A haulback delay of 10-15 seconds allowed juvenile red spot to escape through the square mesh panels, while trawls with no delay showed no significant reduction in the bycatch of this species.

Effect on Bycatch: Reduced the overall weight of bycatch by 38% when mesh panels were oriented horizontally
Reference:
Broadhurst, M.K., Kennelly, S.J., O'Doherty, G., 1996 , Effects of square-mesh panels in codends and of haulback delay on bycatch reduction in the oceanic prawn-trawl fishery of New South Wales, Australia

Northern Australia

Trawls
Prawns
Excluder devices
Sea Snakes Field study in the wild
Summary:

Tests were conducted to determine if twin trawl nets containing a Turtle Excluder Device (TED) and a Popeye Fishbox caught less bycatch then nets fitted only with a TED. Nets that had the Popeye Fishbox located 70 meshes from the codend draw strings had a 48% reduction in the weight of small bycatch, an 87% reduction in number of sea snakes and a 35% reduction in the number of sharks and rays caught. When the Popeye Fishbox was placed 100 meshes from the codend draw strings, the weight of small bycatch was reduced by 28% and the number of sharks and rays was reduced by 27%. No analysis of sea snake bycatch at this distance was carried out. There was no significant difference in the catch of targeted prawns between nets with and without the Popeye Fishbox.

Effect on Bycatch: Reduced the number of sea snakes caught by 87% when the Popeye Fishbox was placed 70 meshes from codend (no analysis was done when the device was placed 100 meshes from codend draw strings)
Reference:
Raudzen, E., 2007 , At sea testing of the Popeye Fishbox bycatch reduction device onboard the FV Adelaide Pearl for approval in Australia's northern prawn fishery

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 11
  • Page 12
  • Page 13
  • Page 14
  • Current page 15
  • Page 16
  • Page 17
  • Page 18
  • Page 19
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »

©2022 Consortium for Wildlife Bycatch Reduction  |  All rights reserved

  • Home
  • About Us
  • What's Bycatch?
    • Species List
  • Database of Publications
    • Bycatch Reduction Techniques Fact Sheets
  • Research Programs
    • Consortium Publications
  • Our Donors and Partners
  • Funding Opportunities
  • Join the Exchange
  • News
  • Events
  • Log in