Menu
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What's Bycatch? Open submenu
  • Database of Publications Open submenu
  • Research Programs Open submenu
  • Our Donors and Partners
  • Funding Opportunities
  • Join the Exchange
  • News
  • Events
  • Log in
Close submenuWhat's Bycatch?
  • Species List
Close submenuDatabase of Publications
  • Bycatch Reduction Techniques Fact Sheets
Close submenuResearch Programs
  • Consortium Publications
Skip to main content
Home

 

Register/Add a study

Menu

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Search The Database

Search The Database

Search Database Menu

  • View All Articles
  • Techniques Glossary
  • Fishing Gear Types
  • Add a Study
Displaying 291 - 300 of 568
Location Gear Catch Technique Bycatch species Type Results
Location

North Sea

Gear
Gillnets
Catch Hake Technique
Acoustic deterrent devices
Bycatch species Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise) Type Field study in the wild Results
Summary:

Experiments were carried out aboard vessels in the Danish North Sea hake gillnet fishery to determine if increasing the spacing of Aqutec AQUAmark100 pingers could be done without negatively impacting the effectiveness of the pinger. Control nets without pingers were tested alongside nets with pingers spaced at 455 m and 585 m. The control nets had a bycatch frequency of 0.54 incidents/haul for harbour porpoises. Nets with pingers spaced at 455 m had an incidence rate of 0 and nets with pingers spaced at 585 m had a bycatch frequency rate of 0.12. Bycatch indences were significantly different between the control and two experimental groups. This suggests that the spacing of pingers may be increased without significantly impacting their ability to reduce bycatch of harbour porpoises. 

Effect on Bycatch: Pingers spaced at 455 m had 0 bycatch; pingers spaced at 585 m had a bycatch rate of 0.12
Reference:
Larsen, F., Krog, C. and Eigaard, R., 2013 , Determining optimal pinger spacing for harbor porpoise bycatch mitigation
Location

Scotian Shelf

Gear
Hooks-and-Lines
Catch Swordfish Technique
Electromagnetic deterrents
Bycatch species Sharks Type Field study in the wild Results
Summary:

Blue sharks account for most of the bycatch in the Canadian pelagic longline swordfish fishery. Electropositive metals (e.g. lanthanide) oxidize in seawater and create electric fields, which can alter the behaviors of several species of sharks. Researchers deployed seven sets (6300 hooks) with three hook treatments (standard hooks, hooks with electropositive metals - neodymium/praseodymium - and hooks with lead weights) on the Scotian Shelf in the Northwest Atlantic. Electropositive metals did not reduce the catch of blue sharks or other common shark bycatch species.  

Effect on Bycatch: No effect
Reference:
Godin, A.C., Wimmer, T., Wang, J.H., Worm, B., 2013 , No effect from rare-earth metal deterrent on shark bycatch in a commercial pelagic longline trial
Location

Global

Gear
Gillnets
Catch Technique Bycatch species Mammals Type Summary study Results
Summary:

This paper is a global assessment of marine mammal (cetacean, pinniped, sirenian, and marine mustelids) bycatch in gillnets and other entangling nets from 1990 to 2011. The authors found that at least 75% of odontocete species, 64% of mysticetes, 66% of pinnipeds, and all sirenian and marine mustelids have been recorded as gillnet bycatch over the past 20 years. 

Reference:
Reeves, R.R., McClellan, K., Werner, T.B., 2013 , Marine mammal bycatch in gillnet and other entangling net fisheries, 1990 to 2011
Location

Global

Gear
Gillnets
Catch Technique Bycatch species Seabirds Type Summary study Results
Summary:

This paper is a global review of seabird bycatch in gillnets. The authors identified 148 seabird species as susceptible to bycatch in gillnets, of which 81 have been recorded incidentally caught. A review of reported bycatch estimates suggests that at least 400,000 birds die in gillnets each year. The highest levels of bycatch are reported in the Northwest Pacific, Iceland, and the Baltic Sea.  

Reference:
Zydelis, R., Small, C., French, G., 2013 , The incidental catch of seabirds in gillnet fisheries: A global review
Location

North Sea

Gear
Trawls
Catch Plaice and sole Technique
Modified ground gear (mobile)
Bycatch species Bony Fishes, Invertebrates Type Field study in the wild Results
Summary:

Studies were conducted aboard beam trawlers in the North Sea to determine the performance of pulse beam compared to conventional tickler chain beam trawlers.  Overall the pulse beam trawl caught 68% less than the conventional trawls.  Specifically, the pulse beam trawl caught significantly fewer plaice and sole compared to the conventional beam trawl. There was no significant difference in catch rates of undersized plaice between the two gears but the pulse beam trawl caught significantly less undersized sole.  Pulse beam trawls caught more turbot and brill (78%-131%) than conventional trawls but fewer cod (15%-60%).  In addition, catch rates of bottom species, including sandstar, common starfish and swimming crabs, were significantly less when the pulse beam trawl was used.

Effect on Bycatch: Significantly fewer invertebrates; no difference in undersized plaice; significantly fewer undersized sole
Reference:
van Marlen, B., Grift, R., van Keeken, O., Ybema, M.S. and van Hal, R., 2006 , Performance of pulse trawling compared to conventional beam trawling
Location

Queensland, Australia

Gear
Non-specific
Catch None Technique
Acoustic deterrent devices
Bycatch species Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters) Type Field study in the wild Results
Summary:

Fumunda acoustic alarms were tested in the absence of nets to determine their ability to modify the behavior of Australian snubfin and humpback dolphins, with possible applications to gillnet fisheries. The alarms emitted a regular interval pulse of 300 ms every 4 seconds at 10 kHz frequency.  The behavior of the animals changed slightly when the alarms were used but the likelihood of them leaving the area was not significantly different from the control.  This suggests this type of acoustic alarm may not be useful as a bycatch mitigation measure for these species.

Effect on Bycatch: No significant effect on Australian snubfin and humpback dolphins
Reference:
Soto, A.B., Cagnazzi, D., Everingham, Y., Parra, G.J., Noad, M. and Marsh, H., 2013 , Acoustic alarms elicit only subtle responses in the behavior of tropical coastal dolphins in Queensland, Australia
Location

Argentina

Gear
Gillnets
Catch weakfish, croaker Technique
Metal oxide/barium sulfate nets
Bycatch species Pontoporia blainvillei (Franciscana dolphin) Type Field study in the wild Results
Summary:

Experimental trials were carried out in Argentina comparing franciscana bycatch rates in standard gillnets with gillnets with increased acoustic reglectivity by infusion with barium sulphate (BaSO4) and increased flexural stiffness of the nylon twine. There was no significant difference in franciscana bycatch rates or target catch rates among the three net types.  

Effect on Bycatch: No effect
Reference:
Bordino, P., Mackay, A.I., Werner, T.B., Northridge, S.P., and Read, A.J., 2013 , Franciscana bycatch is not reduced by acoustically reflective or physically stiffened gillnets
Location

Argentina

Gear
Gillnets
Catch weakfish, croaker Technique
Stiff gillnet
Bycatch species Pontoporia blainvillei (Franciscana dolphin) Type Field study in the wild Results
Summary:

Experimental trials were carried out in Argentina comparing franciscana bycatch rates in standard gillnets with gillnets with increased acoustic reglectivity by infusion with barium sulphate (BaSO4) and increased flexural stiffness of the nylon twine. There was no significant difference in franciscana bycatch rates or target catch rates among the three net types.  

Effect on Bycatch: No effect
Reference:
Bordino, P., Mackay, A.I., Werner, T.B., Northridge, S.P., and Read, A.J., 2013 , Franciscana bycatch is not reduced by acoustically reflective or physically stiffened gillnets
Location

South Africa

Gear
Hooks-and-Lines
Catch Tuna Technique
Bird-scaring devices
Bycatch species Seabirds Type Field study in the wild Results
Summary:

Several seabird bycatch mitigation techniques were tested aboard distant water tuna fisheries in the South African EEZ.  Two types of bird scaring designs, light lines with short streams vs. hybrid lines with a mix of streamer lengths were compared with unweighted branch lines. In addition, unweighted to weighted branch lines were tested and night vs. day setting with a combination of bird scaring lines were tested for their effects on seabird avoidance and targeted fish catch rates.  A total of twenty seven seabird species were observed, but white-chinned petrels were the most common seabird observed and had the highest seabird mortality rate in the study. Albatross (black-browed, yellow-nosed and shy-type) also suffered high mortality rates while stealing bait from the petrels.  Other common surface foraging species included cape petrels. Hybrid lines did appear to reduce sea bird attacks for both species, but the results are not conclusive because the birds could still attack the line at points not protected by the bird scaring lines.  Sets made at night caught far fewer seabirds (0.439 birds/1000 hooks vs. 2 birds/1000 hooks) and catch rates were 18 times higher on the unweighted compared to weighted branch lines (1.07 birds/1000 hooks and 0.06 birds/1000 hooks respectively). The weighted and unweighted branch lines did not affect targeted fish catch rates.

Effect on Bycatch: Hybrid lines appeared to reduce sea bird attacks, but not statistically conclusive
Reference:
Melvin, E.F., Guy, T.J. and Read, L.B., 2013 , Reducing seabird bycatch in the South African joint venture tuna fishery using bird-scaring lines, branch line weighting and nighttime setting of hooks
Location

South Africa

Gear
Hooks-and-Lines
Catch Tuna Technique
Sub-surface bait setting
Bycatch species Seabirds Type Field study in the wild Results
Summary:

Several seabird bycatch mitigation techniques were tested aboard distant water tuna fisheries in the South African EEZ.  Two types of bird scaring designs, light lines with short streams vs. hybrid lines with a mix of streamer lengths were compared with unweighted branch lines. In addition, unweighted to weighted branch lines were tested and night vs. day setting with a combination of bird scaring lines were tested for their effects on seabird avoidance and targeted fish catch rates.  A total of twenty seven seabird species were observed, but white-chinned petrels were the most common seabird observed and had the highest seabird mortality rate in the study. Albatross (black-browed, yellow-nosed and shy-type) also suffered high mortality rates while stealing bait from the petrels.  Other common surface foraging species included cape petrels. Hybrid lines did appear to reduce sea bird attacks for both species, but the results are not conclusive because the birds could still attack the line at points not protected by the bird scaring lines.  Sets made at night caught far fewer seabirds (0.439 birds/1000 hooks vs. 2 birds/1000 hooks) and catch rates were 18 times higher on the unweighted compared to weighted branch lines (1.07 birds/1000 hooks and 0.06 birds/1000 hooks respectively). The weighted and unweighted branch lines did not affect targeted fish catch rates.

Effect on Bycatch: 1.07 birds/1000 hooks (unweighted) vs. 0.06 birds/1000 hooks (weighted)
Reference:
Melvin, E.F., Guy, T.J. and Read, L.B., 2013 , Reducing seabird bycatch in the South African joint venture tuna fishery using bird-scaring lines, branch line weighting and nighttime setting of hooks

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 26
  • Page 27
  • Page 28
  • Page 29
  • Current page 30
  • Page 31
  • Page 32
  • Page 33
  • Page 34
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »

©2022 Consortium for Wildlife Bycatch Reduction  |  All rights reserved

Close menu

Gillnets

Gillnets are single, double, or triple layers of net suspended vertically in the water column. The top of the net is connected to floats (headrope), while the bottom is weighted (footrope). Adjustment of the floats and weights allows gillnets to be positioned at varying depth, depending on the target species. Gillnets are generally deployed in large numbers and trap fish either by entangling the gills or by entangling all or part of the fish body. Variation in net mesh size allows fishermen to control the size of their catch.


Read More

Acoustic deterrent devices

Underwater sound-emitting devices (maximum level of intensity equivalent to approximately 175 dB re 1 µPa @ 1m) attached to fishing gear, principally gillnets. ADD’s such as acoustic pingers are now mandated for use in some fisheries in the U.S. Northwest Atlantic, California driftnet, and in Europe. The sound of these devices is believed to alert an animal to the presence of the net and thus decrease the probability of entanglement.


Read More

Hooks-and-Lines

Fish are attracted to hooks-and-lines by natural or artificial bair placed on a hook, which captures the fish when it bites the bait. One or multiple lines may be used to catch pelagic, demersal, or benthic species. Different line and hook types are used depending on the target species.

Read More

Electromagnetic deterrents

Electromagnetic fields created in the vicinity of a fishing activity to deter interaction of non-target species with fishing gear, bait, or target species. For example, rare earth metals, such as cerium or lanthanide, are attached or imbedded into hooks (longline, hook and line etc.) in an effort to deter the incidental bycatch of sharks and rays (Tallack et al. 2009).


Read More

Gillnets

Gillnets are single, double, or triple layers of net suspended vertically in the water column. The top of the net is connected to floats (headrope), while the bottom is weighted (footrope). Adjustment of the floats and weights allows gillnets to be positioned at varying depth, depending on the target species. Gillnets are generally deployed in large numbers and trap fish either by entangling the gills or by entangling all or part of the fish body. Variation in net mesh size allows fishermen to control the size of their catch.


Read More

Gillnets

Gillnets are single, double, or triple layers of net suspended vertically in the water column. The top of the net is connected to floats (headrope), while the bottom is weighted (footrope). Adjustment of the floats and weights allows gillnets to be positioned at varying depth, depending on the target species. Gillnets are generally deployed in large numbers and trap fish either by entangling the gills or by entangling all or part of the fish body. Variation in net mesh size allows fishermen to control the size of their catch.


Read More

Trawls

Trawls are cone-shaped nets with two, four, or more panels, ending in a bag. They are towed at midwater or near the bottom, and held open horizontally by heavy doors (otter trawls), by beams, or by the tension created by lines connecting the net to two separate vessels (pair trawls). The net opening is sustained vertically by floats and weights. Fish size and species is controlled by mesh size; pelagic, demersal, and benthic fish can be targeted.

Read More

Modified ground gear (mobile)

Modifications made to mobile fishing gear that fishes on the sea floor. An example would be the "Newhaven" spring tooth dredge, used in the Isle of Man queen scallop fishery. This dredge is wider and fishes higher off the benthos than what is typically used, and has a rubber lip instead of metal teeth (Hinz et al. 2009).


Read More

Non-specific


Read More

Acoustic deterrent devices

Underwater sound-emitting devices (maximum level of intensity equivalent to approximately 175 dB re 1 µPa @ 1m) attached to fishing gear, principally gillnets. ADD’s such as acoustic pingers are now mandated for use in some fisheries in the U.S. Northwest Atlantic, California driftnet, and in Europe. The sound of these devices is believed to alert an animal to the presence of the net and thus decrease the probability of entanglement.


Read More

Gillnets

Gillnets are single, double, or triple layers of net suspended vertically in the water column. The top of the net is connected to floats (headrope), while the bottom is weighted (footrope). Adjustment of the floats and weights allows gillnets to be positioned at varying depth, depending on the target species. Gillnets are generally deployed in large numbers and trap fish either by entangling the gills or by entangling all or part of the fish body. Variation in net mesh size allows fishermen to control the size of their catch.


Read More

Metal oxide/barium sulfate nets

Nylon nets infused with barium sulfate or other metal compounds that have acoustical detection features for reducing small cetacean bycatch. These may reduce small cetacean and sea turtle bycatch by increasing the likelihood that these animals would “bounce” off the netting.


Read More

Gillnets

Gillnets are single, double, or triple layers of net suspended vertically in the water column. The top of the net is connected to floats (headrope), while the bottom is weighted (footrope). Adjustment of the floats and weights allows gillnets to be positioned at varying depth, depending on the target species. Gillnets are generally deployed in large numbers and trap fish either by entangling the gills or by entangling all or part of the fish body. Variation in net mesh size allows fishermen to control the size of their catch.


Read More

Stiff gillnet

Stiffness of the nylon twine is enhanced by adding a different grade of nylon (Bordino et al. 2013).


Read More

Hooks-and-Lines

Fish are attracted to hooks-and-lines by natural or artificial bair placed on a hook, which captures the fish when it bites the bait. One or multiple lines may be used to catch pelagic, demersal, or benthic species. Different line and hook types are used depending on the target species.

Read More

Bird-scaring devices

A number of devices used to disturb birds from foraging on bait. These include streamers attached to a pole suspended above the area where bait is set or placed in the water, towed buoys, and water jets (Melvin et al. 2010).


Read More

Hooks-and-Lines

Fish are attracted to hooks-and-lines by natural or artificial bair placed on a hook, which captures the fish when it bites the bait. One or multiple lines may be used to catch pelagic, demersal, or benthic species. Different line and hook types are used depending on the target species.

Read More

Sub-surface bait setting

Methods that reduce bycatch by eliminating gear sets at the ocean surface by changing the property of fishing lines so that they are less likely to catch or ensnare animals feeding at the surface or in the mid-water column.


Read More