Skip to main content
Home

 

Register/Add a study

Menu

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Search The Database

Search The Database

Search Database Menu

  • View All Articles
  • Techniques Glossary
  • Fishing Gear Types
  • Add a Study
Displaying 351 - 360 of 568
Location Gear Catch Technique Bycatch species Type Results

Auckland, New Zealand

Trawls
Squid
Excluder devices
Pinnipeds Summary study
Summary:

The authors conducted an extensive literature review to determine if Sea Lion Excluder Devices (SLEDs) allow sea lions to escape from trawl nets and if they subsequently survived. In addtion, the literature was reviewed to determine if head trauma was likely when sea lions come into contact with stainless steel SLED grids. According to the literature, SLEDs are effective in reducing sea lion bycatch in trawl nets and resulted in a reduction of observed sea lion mortalities. In addtion, the literature indicates that increased head trauma, due to contact with the SLED grids, is unlikely. 

Effect on Bycatch: SLEDs reduce the incidental capture of sea lions and do not contribute to increased head trauma
Reference:
Hamilton, S., Baker, G.B., 2015 , Review of research and assessments on the efficacy of sea lion exclusion devices in reducing the incidental mortality of New Zealand sea lions Phocarctos hookeri in the Auckland Islands squid trawl fishery

Costa Rica

Hooks-and-Lines
swordfish and tuna
Dyed bait
Caretta caretta (Loggerhead turtle), Demochelys coriacea (Leatherback sea turtle) Field study in the wild
Summary:

Although effective with captive loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and Kemp˙s ridley (Lepiochelys kempii) sea turtles, blue dyed bait is not effective in reducing olive ridley (Lepidochelys olivacea) and green sea turtle (Chelonia mydas) bycatch in longline fisheries in Costa Rica.

Effect on Bycatch: Reduced interactions
Reference:
Swimmer, Y., R. Arauz, B. Higgins, L. McNaughton, M. McCracken, J. Ballestero, and R. Brill., 2005 , Food color and marine turtle feeding behavior: Can blue bait reduce turtle bycatch in commercial fisheries?

NW Atlantic

Hooks-and-Lines
swordfish and tuna
Alternative bait

Circle hooks
Caretta caretta (Loggerhead turtle), Demochelys coriacea (Leatherback sea turtle) Field study in the wild
Summary:

18/0 circle hooks when compared with J hooks significantly reduce loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and leatherback (Dermocheles coriacea) sea turtle bycatch in Atlantic longline fisheries for pelagic swordfish. Circle hooks also reduced the rate of hook ingestion by loggerhead sea turtles. The combination of circle hooks and mackerel bait was the most effective in reducing sea turtle bycatch and had no negative effect on swordfish catch. Use of novel bait species (mackerel instead of squid bait) reduced loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and leatherback (Dermocheles coriacea) sea turtle bycatch in the Atlantic longline swordfish fishery. Loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta) bycatch in the Atlantic longline fishery increased with an increase in total soak time. Soak time was insignificant for swordfish but it was significant for bigeye tuna.

Effect on Bycatch: Reduced interactions
Reference:
Watson, J.W., S.P. Epperly, A.K. Shah, and D.G. Foster., 2005 , Fishing methods to reduce sea turtle mortality associated with pelagic longlines

Atlantic

Hooks-and-Lines
swordfish and tuna
Alternative bait
Caretta caretta (Loggerhead turtle), Demochelys coriacea (Leatherback sea turtle) Field study in the wild
Summary: Circle hooks significantly reduce loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and leatherback (Dermocheles coriacea) sea turtle bycatch in Atlantic longline fisheries. Swordfish catch decreased when circle hooks were baited with squid but increased when baited with mackerel. Tuna catch increased when circle hooks were baited with squid but decreased when baited with mackerel.
Effect on Bycatch: Reduced interactions
Reference:
Watson, J.W., D. Foster, S. Epperly, and A. Shah, 2004 , Experiments in the Western Atlantic Northeast Distant Waters to Evaluate Sea Turtle Mitigation Measures in the Pelagic Longline Fishery. Report on Experiments Conducted in 2001-2003

Azores

Hooks-and-Lines
Swordfish and blue shark
Circle hooks
Caretta caretta (Loggerhead turtle) Field study in the wild
Summary:

There was no significant difference in the number of loggerhead sea turtles caught in the Azores longline swordfish and blue shark fishery between straight 16/0, offset 16/0, and offset 18/0 circle hooks. Circle hooks decreased the rate of throat hooking in loggerhead sea turtles caught in the Azores longline swordfish and blue shark fishery. Straight 16/0 circle hooks caught the most blue sharks in the Azores longline swordfish and blue shark fishery, followed by offset 18/0 circle hooks. Offset 16/0 circle hooks caught the fewest blue sharks.

Effect on Bycatch: There was no significant difference in the number of loggerhead sea turtles caught in the Azores longline swordfish and blue shark fishery between straight 16/0, offset 16/0, and offset 18/0 circle hooks.
Reference:
Bolton, A. and K. Bjorndal, 2004 , Experiment to Evaluate Gear Modification on Rates of Sea Turtle Bycatch in the Swordfish Longline Fishery in the Azores Phase 3

Azores

Hooks-and-Lines
Swordfish and blue shark
Circle hooks
Caretta caretta (Loggerhead turtle) Field study in the wild
Summary:

Japanese tuna hook 3.6mm S/S caught significantly more loggerhead sea turtles than non-offset 16/0 and 18/0 circle hooks and caught more turtles in the throat than the circle hooks in the Azores longline swordfish and blue shark fishery. Non-offset 18/0 circle hooks caught fewer loggerhead sea turtles than non-offset 16/0 circle hooks in the Azores longline swordfish and blue shark fishery. There was no significant difference in the number of blue sharks caught on non-offset 16/0 and 18/0 circle hooks in the Azores longline swordfish and blue shark fishery.

Effect on Bycatch: Circle hooks resulted in fewer turtles being caught in the throat
Reference:
Bolton, A. and K. Bjorndal, 2005 , Experiment to Evaluate Gear Modification on Rates of Sea Turtle Bycatch in the Swordfish Longline Fishery in the Azores Phase 4

Alaska

Hooks-and-Lines
Pacific halibut
Electromagnetic deterrents
Skates/Rays Field study in the wild
Summary: Rare earth metals (made of cerium mischmetal) were compared with control treatments of standard circle hooks and inert steel above circle hooks on longline fishing gear to determine if bycatch reduction of spiny dogfish could be achieved. Results indicated a slight reduction in dogfish bycatch and a greater reduction in catch of longnose skate on hooks with mischmetal. Problems for using mischmetal commercially include its expense, hazardous nature, and rapid hydrolysis in seawater.
Effect on Bycatch: Experimental hooks resulted in greater reduction on catch of longnose skate
Reference:
Kaimmer, S. M., and A.W. Stoner., 2008 , Field investigation of rare-earth metal as a deterrent to spiny dogfish in the Pacific halibut fishery

Shannon Estuary, Ireland

Acoustic deterrent devices
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters) Field study in the wild
Summary: Trials to assess the behavioural response of free-ranging bottlenose dolphins to continuous and responsive pingers were conducted. In boat based trials both types of pinger affected dolphin behaviour, while in static trials the detection of dolphin vocalisations was significantly lower in the presence of active continuous pingers.
Effect on Bycatch: Change in vocalisation rate in static trials when continuous pingers were active
Reference:
Leeney, R.H., Berrow, S., McGrath, D., O'Brien, J., Cosgrove, R. & Godley, B.J., 2007 , Effects of pingers on the behaviour of bottlenose dolphins

Strait of Sicily

Hooks-and-Lines
Swordfish
Circle hooks
Caretta caretta (Loggerhead turtle) Field study in the wild
Summary: The use of circle hooks (16/0) instead of J hooks (size 2) on pelagic longline gear, reduced the incidental capture of immature loggerhead sea turtles and did not affect the catch rates or fish size of the target species. There was also a significant difference in hook location between the two hooks, with more J hooks being swallowed.
Effect on Bycatch: J hooks resulted in more hooks being swallowed compared to circle hooks
Reference:
Piovano, S., Swimmer, Y., Giacoma, C., 2009 , Are circle hooks effective in reducing incidental captures of loggerhead sea turtles in a Mediterranean longline fishery?

Equatorial Atlantic Ocean

Hooks-and-Lines
Tuna
Circle hooks
Bony Fishes Field study in the wild
Summary:

The effect of circle hooks and J-style hooks on the catch composition, catch rates, hooking location and status of release of target and bycatch species were compared on pelagic longline vessels.  There were significant differences in catch rates between the two hook types for bigeye tuna, which had higher catch rates on circle hooks and sailfish, pelagic stingrays, and leatherback sea turtles, which had higher catch rates on J-style hooks.  Survival of bigeye and yellowfin tunas was significantly higher when circle hooks were used and bigeye and yellowfin tunas, swordfish and sailfish had significantly higher external hookings when circle hooks were used.  The results suggests using 18/0 circle hooks with a zero degree offset could increase the survival of bycatch species while having minimal effects on the catches of target species.

Effect on Bycatch: Swordfish and sailfish had significantly higher external hookings when circle hooks were used
Reference:
Pacheco, J.C., Kerstetter, D.W., Hazin, F.H., Hazin, H., Segundo, R.S.S.L., Graves, J.E., Carvalho, F. and Travassos, P.E., 2011 , A comparison of circle hook and J hook performance in a western equatorial Atlantic Ocean pelagic longline fishery

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 32
  • Page 33
  • Page 34
  • Page 35
  • Current page 36
  • Page 37
  • Page 38
  • Page 39
  • Page 40
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »

©2022 Consortium for Wildlife Bycatch Reduction  |  All rights reserved

  • Home
  • About Us
  • What's Bycatch?
    • Species List
  • Database of Publications
    • Bycatch Reduction Techniques Fact Sheets
  • Research Programs
    • Consortium Publications
  • Our Donors and Partners
  • Funding Opportunities
  • Join the Exchange
  • News
  • Events
  • Log in