Skip to main content
Home

 

Register/Add a study

Menu

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Search The Database

Search The Database

Search Database Menu

  • View All Articles
  • Techniques Glossary
  • Fishing Gear Types
  • Add a Study
Displaying 401 - 410 of 568
Location Gear Catch Technique Bycatch species Type Results

Gulf of Maine

Traps
Lobster
At-call pop-up buoys

Timed release
Mammals, Eubalaena glacialis (NA Right whale), Sea Turtles Study in the lab
Summary:

This article describes the design and fabrication of a prototype rope-less fishing system that might be used in the Gulf of Maine lobster fishery. Rope-less fishing gear, which secures vertical fishing lines to the bottom until they are released for hauling, is a potential mitigation measure to reduce vertical line entanglements of marine mammals including North Atlantic right whales, along with leatherback sea turtles. The prototypes consists of a flotation line spool capable of holding up to 900 m of 1/2 in line. The spool is secured to a lobster trawl by a mechanical release that can be triggered for hauling either using a digital timer or acoustic transponder. In addition to the rope-less prototype, the study conducted a preliminary investigation on the passive acoustic detectability of rope-less gear.

Effect on Bycatch: Not tested
Reference:
Partan, J. and K. Ball, 2016 , Rope-less fishing technology development

Cape Solander, Sydney Australia

N/A
Acoustic deterrent devices
Megaptera novaeangliae (Humpback whale) Field study in the wild
Summary:

Acoustic deterrents were tested for their ability to deter humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) from potential sources of entanglement. Low frequency (3 kHz, 135 +/- 5 db, 5 s emission interval and 400 ms emission duration) alarms were tested. Alarms were placed in the center of the northerly migration path (southern hemisphere) of humpback whales. Observers, who were unaware of the alarm status (i.e. on/off) tracked the pods as they passed the alarms. Sixty percent of the pods (N=137) passed within the assumed detectable range (500 m) of the alarm. Sixty five percent passed the alarm while it was onand 52% when it was off. Therefore, there does not appear to be any noticeable response from the whales to the alarms. There were no differences in the directionality, course heading or dive duration within the detectable range of the alarm, whether on or off. It is therefore unlikely that single alarms currently used with trap or pot lines are effective at reducing interactions with humpback whales.

Effect on Bycatch: No detectable differences in behavior was found between when alarms turned on or off.
Reference:
Harcourt, R., Pirotta, V., Heller, G., Peddemors, V. and D. Slip, 2014 , A whale alarm fails to deter migrating humpback whales: an empirical test

US East Coast and Canadian Maritimes

Traps
Various
Weak links/ropes
Eubalaena glacialis (NA Right whale), Balaenoptera acutostrata (Minke whale), Megaptera novaeangliae (Humpback whale) Field study in the wild
Summary:

This study investigated the impact of rope polymer type, breaking strength and diameter in relation to the injury severity of entangled baleen whales, primarily North Atlantic Right whales (Eubalaena glacialis). Fishing gear removed from live and dead entangled whales from the US East Coast and Canadian Maritimes region between 1994 and 2010 were included in this study. Average tested breaking strength of removed rope was 2,616 bs, 26% below strength at manufacture. Median rope diameter was 3/8 in. The breaking strength of ropes was significantly higher for right (4,338 mean lbs) and humpback (3,8520 mean lbs) whales compared to smaller minke whales (2,353 mean lbs). Stronger ropes (7,664 lbs) entangled adult right whales when compared to juveniles (mean 3,446 lbs) and all humpback whales (mean 3,906 lbs). Study results suggest that if ropes with breaking strengths of 1,700 lbs or less were used, the number of life-threatening whale entanglements could be reduced by at least 72%.

Effect on Bycatch: Ropes with a breaking strength of 1,700 lbs or less could reduce life-threatening entanglements of North Atlantic Right whales by at least 72%. Right and humpback were entangled in ropes with stronger breaking strength than those involving minke whales.
Reference:
Knowlton, A.R., Robbins, J., Landry, S., McKenna, H.A., Kraus, S.D. and T.B. Werner, 2016 , Effects of fishing rope strength on the severity of large whale entanglements

Cape Solander, Sydney Australia

N/A
Acoustic deterrent devices
Megaptera novaeangliae (Humpback whale) Field study in the wild
Summary:

The ability of acoustic alarms to alert migrating humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) to fishing gear was tested. Two alarms were used, each with a distinct tone. One alarm had a 5 kHz tone (5 s emission interval and 400 ms emission duration), and one had a 2-2.1 kHz swept tone (8 s emission interval and 1.5 s emission duration). The response of the whales in terms of changes to surface behavior and travel direction were investigated. A total of 108 migration tracks were collected using a theodolite. The study was conducted at Cape Solander, Sydney, Australia. The whales showed no detectable response to either of the alarms; direction and surfacing behavior did not vary between when the alarms were on or off. These types of tones are unlikely to be effective as whale entanglement deterrents.

Effect on Bycatch: There were no differences in behavior of migrating whales when alarms were on or off
Reference:
Pirotta, V., Slip, D., Jonsen, I.D., Peddemors, V.M., Cato, D.H., Ross, G. and R. Harcourt, 2016 , Migrating humpback whales show no detectable response to whale alarms off Sydney, Australia

Worldwide

Hooks-and-Lines
N/A Eubalaena glacialis (NA Right whale) Field study in the wild
Summary:

Documented entanglements, long-term population studies and mark-recapture studies were evaluated to determine the impact of cryptic mortality on North Atlantic right whales. Results suggest entangled adults had low initial survival (0.749). Adults that did survive the first year had survival rates similar (0.952) to those animals never entangled (0.961 female and 0.986 male). Juveniles had post entanglement survival rates similar to initial survival rates of entangled adults, 0.733, but lower than un-impacted juveniles (0.978). Health impacts were the most predictive aspect of subsequent survival. In addition, entanglement configuration and resulting injuries also affected the final outcome. Human interventions appear to improve survival outcomes for entangled whales.

Effect on Bycatch: Entanglement with fishing gear reduces survival rates (immediate) of adults and juveniles. Human intervention improves survival outcome for high risk interactions.
Reference:
Robbins, J., Knowlton, A.R. and S. Landry, 2015 , Apparent survival of North Atlantic right whales after entanglement in fishing gear

Hauruki Gulf, New Zealand

N/A Large Cetaceans (maximum length > 7.5 meters) Summary study
Summary:

Bryde's whale (Balaenoptera edeni) behavior was studied using suction-cup attached tags. Behavior was studied to identify potential mitigation measures that could reduce lethal vessel strikes in the Hauraki Gulf, New Zealand. Tagged whales spent 91% of their time at depths within the maximum draft of vessels. This behavior could increase the potential for vessel strikes. Analysis of vessel transits and whale sightings suggested that re-routing of vessel traffic in the Gulf would not be beneficial because whales are distributed throughout the Gulf. Passive acoustic devices are not viable due to the low vocal activity of whales and potential masking of noise from vessels. A social forum was developed with stakeholders. The only viable option decided upon by this forum was a Transit Protocol for Shipping which includes voluntary speed restrictions and a monitoring plan.

Effect on Bycatch: N/A
Reference:
Constantine, R., Johnson, M., Riekkola, L., Jervis, S., Kozmian-Ledward, L., Dennis, T., Torres, L.G. and N. Aguilar de Soto, 2015 , Mitigation of vessel-strike mortality of endangered Bryde's whales in the Hauraki Gulf, New Zealand

Gillnets
N/A Balaenoptera acutostrata (Minke whale), Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise) Summary study
Summary:

A spatially and temporally explicit Productivity and Susceptibility Analysis (PSA) was developed to screen cetacean species for bycatch risk. This PSA can be included under Ecosystem Based Fisheries Management (EBFM). The potential risk to harbor porpoises and minke whales from static fishing gear was investigated. Harbor porpoise's had a low to moderate biological risk from bycatch compared to other cetacean species. Minke whales are less productive than harbor porpoise's but also have a low to moderate biological risk to bycatch. The results suggested that high, low and moderate risk areas can all exist within the range of individual fisheries (gillnet, longline, pots). Therefore, management measures can focus on areas of the greatest risk to these species. EBFM can complement and support current management measures.

Effect on Bycatch: n/a
Reference:
Brown, S.L., Reid, D. and E. Rogan, 2015 , Spatial and temporal assessment of potential risk to cetaceans from static fishing gears

Hooks-and-Lines
Acoustic deterrent devices

Time area closures
Mammals Summary study
Summary:

This study provides a summary of methods that can be used to reduce depredation and bycatch of marine mammals in longline fisheries. Methods include 1) spatial management methods, 2) acoustic methods, 3) physical methods and 4) 'other methods'. The results indicate that some methods can be used with both pelagic and demersal longlines, while others can be used with only one or the other. In addition to the methods investigated, the results highlight significant knowledge gaps.These include survivability after hooking and entanglement. This lack of information hinders assessing serious injury and mortality to marine mammals after interactions with longline fisheries occur. The development of deterrents would also be improved with increased knowledge of marine mammal behavior near longlines.

Reference:
Werner, T.B., Northridge, S., McClellan Press, K. and N. Young., 2015 , Mitigating bycatch and depredation of marine mammals in longline fisheries

New South Wales, Australia

Pots
n/a Large Cetaceans (maximum length > 7.5 meters), Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters) Summary study
Summary:

This study collected information on cetacean incidents (carcasses, injured and debilitated animals found onshore, entrapped in shallow water, entangled or floating offshore) that have occurred in New South Wales, Australia. Information on marine mammal incidents was reported to the New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service and recorded into a Marine Fauna Events Database. This information was analyzed for trends in mortality and population dynamics such as age and sex ratios. Records existed for the time period of 1790 to 2013. For the majority of incidents, the cause of mortality/morbidity could not be determined. Anthropogenic causes, such as entanglements, accounted for more incidents compared to natural causes such as disease or predation. Entanglement was the largest cause of cetacean incidents that were made up mostly of humpback whale entanglements. Reporting of incidents have increased over time, from 1.3 incidents per year prior to 1960 to 43.5 per year during 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013. A concentration of incidents were found in the Northern Rivers and North Coast regions. This study highlights the importance of these types of databases.

Effect on Bycatch: n/a
Reference:
Lyod, H.B. and G.A. Ross, 2015 , Long-term trends in cetacean incidents in New South Wales, Australia

Worldwide and Iceland

n/a Large Cetaceans (maximum length > 7.5 meters), Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise), Demochelys coriacea (Leatherback sea turtle) Study in the lab
Summary:

Documented entanglement cases for sea turtles and cetaceans in mussel aquaculture gear worldwide were collected. Online surveys and semi-structured interviews with mussel operators were used in Iceland. A total of seven entanglement reports were collected, four baleen whales, one harbour porpoise and two leatherback sea turtles. Mussel spat collecting ropes were involved in the majority of cases. Out of the seven reports, two occurred in Iceland. The proximity between cetacean distributions and mussel farming sites is likely a factor in these interactions. In addition, in Icelandic summer spat collection occurs when the largest concentrations of cetaceans are found in its waters. Iceland should consider some sort of mandatory reporting system for these interactions.

Effect on Bycatch: n/a
Reference:
Young, M, 2015 , Marine animal entanglements in mussel aquaculture gear: Documented cases from mussel farming regions of the world including first-hand accounts from Iceland

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 37
  • Page 38
  • Page 39
  • Page 40
  • Current page 41
  • Page 42
  • Page 43
  • Page 44
  • Page 45
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »

©2022 Consortium for Wildlife Bycatch Reduction  |  All rights reserved

  • Home
  • About Us
  • What's Bycatch?
    • Species List
  • Database of Publications
    • Bycatch Reduction Techniques Fact Sheets
  • Research Programs
    • Consortium Publications
  • Our Donors and Partners
  • Funding Opportunities
  • Join the Exchange
  • News
  • Events
  • Log in