Search The Database

Information on bycatch of Hector's dolphins in New Zealand waters was reviewed and new estimates were presented. Prior to 2008, 110-150 Hector's dolphins were estimated to be caught annually. Of these, 35-46 were caught of the east coast South Island. Between May 2009 and April 2010, an estimated 23 Hector's dolphins were caught of the east coast South Island. Previous risk analyses have shown similar results. Combined this information suggests continued overlap between Hector's dolphins and fisheries. The risk analyses indicate that Hector's dolphin populations could recovery to 15,000 individuals (from 7873) over the next 50 years if there was no fishing mortality. Risk analyses all indicate that the population of Hector's dolphins has declined substantially due to fishing mortality. Current management and  recovery actions are unlikely to to result in recovery of this species. 

Six different acoustic pingers and signals were tested at sea to determine their impact on dolphin behavior. Two prototype devices from the Board Iascaigh Mhara (BIM) were tested. One was a continuous pinger (CP) and the second a responsive pinger (RP). These were tested on five occasions. A third modified RP was also tested on five occasions and a fourth RP was modified into a multiple signal output device and tested on 15 occasions. In addition, the CETASAVER and Dolphin Deterrent Device (DDD) were tested on five and ten occasions respectively. The BIM and RP acoustic pingers did not elicit any response from the dolphins. The CETASAVER and DDD elicited a mild response. The authors suggest significant modification to the signal type or source level. At the current state of development acoustic pingers may not provide effective deterrent signals to dolphins.

Four commercially available pingers (AIRMAR, Aquamark 100, Fumunda, Save Wave Saver) were tested on vessels operating in Cornwall targeting hake with gillnets. Pingers were tested for their effectiveness at reducing incidental interactions between the gillnets and porpoises. Only one of the four tested pingers, AIRMAR, performed 'satisfactorily'. 

A study was conducted in Sundarbans mangrove forest of Bangladesh to assess the behavioral response of Ganges River dolphins to pingers. Just under 62 hours of theodolite tracking data from 75 dolphin sightings and 2,829 theodolite fixes of dolphin surfacing were analyzed. The results suggest pingers had a subtle displacement effect on the dolphins. There was an increase in the mean surfacing distance of dolphins from the pinger buoy within a 100 m radius. Pingers did not result in a decrease in the minimum distance of approach for dolphins. Pingers did not change the frequency of sightings detected within 100 m of the pinger buoys. The results remain unclear whether pingers would be able to prevent entanglement in gillnets by Ganges River dolphins.

The impact of Medina panels attached to tuna purse seine nets operating in the US fishery was investigating for their effect on porpoise mortality. Medina panels are reduced mesh size netting hung from 2-inch mesh webbing on the purse seine. The authors took measurements of penetration of porpoise snouts and flippers through mesh openings of 2, 1 7/8, 1 1/2 and 1 inch to determine the potential reduction in porpoise entanglements. Even the smallest-sized porpoise could not fit its snout through the 1 inch panel, even with its mouth closed. Recent tests of porpoise 'aprons' and 'chutes' could be promising in making these small mesh panels compatible with tuna purse seine performance.

Researchers deployed LED lights on the floatlines of paired gillnets (control vs illuminated net) during 864 fishing sets using small-scale vessels departing from three Peruvian ports between 2015 and 2018. Bycatch probability per set for sea turtles, cetaceans and seabirds as well as catch per unit effort (CPUE) of target species were analyzed for illuminated and control nets using a generalized linear mixed-effects model (GLMM). For illuminated nets, bycatch probability per set was reduced by up to 74.4 % for sea turtles and 70.8 % for small cetaceans in comparison to non-illuminated, control nets. For seabirds, nominal bycatch per unit effort (BPUE) decreased by 84.0 % in the presence of LEDs. Target species CPUE was not negatively affected by the presence of LEDs. This study highlights the efficacy of net illumination as a multi-taxa BRT for small-scale gillnet fisheries in Peru. 

A long-term study assessed the efficiency of acoustic pingers (AQUAmark 100, 20-160kHz) in reducing the encounter rates of finless porpoises (Neophocaena spp.) with fishing nets. The study used a passive recorder to obtain acoustic encounter rates of echolocating finless porpoises over two eight-month periods. Encounter rates were significantly lower in periods when pingers were in use, but this effect decreased over time. By the end of each study period, the number of encounters was greater than those during periods without pingers, suggesting that habituation had occurred. However, when pingers were reactivated after four months of no use, encounters returned to lower levels, such as those observed during the beginning of the experiment. The results suggest that habituation to pingers may be mitigated by alternating periods of silence with periods of active pinger use. 

The study combined fisher questionnaires, acoustic monitoring, and participatory experiments to investigate the occurrence of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncates) in the gillnet fisheries of Northern Cyprus. Dolphins were present in fishing grounds throughout the year, and were detected at 28% of net sets. Net damage was six times greater when dolphins were present during sets. Use of an acoustic pinger (AQUAmark 200, 5-160kHz) was tested, but had no significant effect on dolphin presence. 

The experiment evaluated the effectiveness of two types of pingers (Aquamark 100 and Aquamark 200) to reduce the bycatch rate of harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) in a set gillnet fishery in the Black Sea. The study also evaluated the effects of the pingers on catch of target and non-target fish species. There was no significant difference in catch of target and non-target fish species in trials with pingers versus control sets. There was also no significant difference between number of harbor porpoises caught in nets using pingers and when no pingers were used, although a low overall number of porpoises were caught (eight harbor porpoises were caught during the experiment – three in control nets, three in nets using the Aquamark 100, and one in nets using the Aquamark 200). 

This study was a controlled experiment within in a harbor that investigated the effectiveness of attaching small, reflective objects (8mm wide acrylic glass spheres) to standard gillnets to increase acoustic reflectivity and therefore mitigate bycatch of small, echolocating cetaceans.  The study found that the spheres increased the acoustic backscattering strength and echo, which suggests that the spears would be an effective way to reduce small cetacean bycatch. Gillnets with sphere-sphere distance of 20cm performed best.