Skip to main content
Home

 

Register/Add a study

Menu

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Search The Database

Search The Database

Search Database Menu

  • View All Articles
  • Techniques Glossary
  • Fishing Gear Types
  • Add a Study
Displaying 561 - 570 of 628
Location Gear Catch Technique Bycatch species Type Results

Skjálfandi Bay and Eyjafjörður, Iceland

None
Acoustic deterrent devices
Large Cetaceans (maximum length > 7.5 meters), Megaptera novaeangliae (Humpback whale) Field study in the wild
Summary:

The authors conducted field studies off the coast of Iceland to measure the response of humpback whales (Megaptera noveangliae) in their feeding grounds to a whale pinger and seal scarer (acoustic deterrents). Results indicate that whale pingers caused a significant increase in humpback swimming speed and a significant decrease in surface feeding, and that seal scarers caused no significant, consistent behavioral changes.  Additionally, the authors conducted a field trial of whale pingers on a capelin purse seine; the pingers did usually deter whales from the purse seine, and the two times that whales entered the net, the pingers combined with crew responsiveness seemed to aid their escape. Whale pingers can be a useful humpback whale entanglement mitigation tool, but they should be used only short-term so as to avoid reduced fitness consequences.

 

Effect on Bycatch: Swimming speed increased, surface feeding decreased
Reference:
Basran, C., Woelfing, B., Neumann, C., and M.H. Rasmussen, 2020 , Behavioural Responses of Humpback Whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) to Two Acoustic Deterrent Devices in a Northern Feeding Ground off Iceland

Neskaupstaður, Iceland

Surrounding nets and seine nets
Capelin (Mallotus villosus)
Acoustic deterrent devices
Large Cetaceans (maximum length > 7.5 meters), Megaptera novaeangliae (Humpback whale) Field study in the wild
Summary:

The authors conducted field studies off the coast of Iceland to measure the response of humpback whales (Megaptera noveangliae) in their feeding grounds to a whale pinger and seal scarer (acoustic deterrents). Results indicate that whale pingers caused a significant increase in humpback swimming speed and a significant decrease in surface feeding, and that seal scarers caused no significant, consistent behavioral changes.  Additionally, the authors conducted a field trial of whale pingers on a capelin purse seine; the pingers did usually deter whales from the purse seine, and the two times that whales entered the net, the pingers combined with crew responsiveness seemed to aid their escape. Whale pingers can be a useful humpback whale entanglement mitigation tool, but they should be used only short-term so as to avoid reduced fitness consequences.

 

Effect on Bycatch: Deterred from entering net, or if they enter, the surface pingers seemed to lead them toward escape
Reference:
Basran, C., Woelfing, B., Neumann, C., and M.H. Rasmussen, 2020 , Behavioural Responses of Humpback Whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) to Two Acoustic Deterrent Devices in a Northern Feeding Ground off Iceland

Scotland

Pots
northern shrimp (Pandalus borealis)
Visual deterrents
Bony Fishes Field study in the wild
Summary:

This study reports on trials investigating the use of white Light Emitting Diodes (LEDs) to improve target catch and reduce nontarget catch in northern shrimp  (Pandalus borealis) and Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) pot fisheries. Illuminated pots led to a significantly higher catch per unit effort (CPUE) of northern shrimp, but levels were still not commercially viable. LEDs also resulted in higher juvenile poor cod (Trisopterus minutus) bycatch and reduced Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) catch. LEDs on nets may be promising for increasing CPUE and an alternative to trawl fisheries for northern shrimp.

Effect on Bycatch: increase CPUE of northern shrimp
Reference:
Horton, T. W., Enever, R., Godley, B. J., Kibel, P., Malone, D., McAndrew, D., & Doherty, P. D., 2025 , Effects of illumination and pot design on catch and bycatch when targeting northern shrimp (Pandalus borealis) using white LED PotLights

Scotland

Pots
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus)
Visual deterrents
Bony Fishes Field study in the wild
Summary:

This study reports on trials investigating the use of white Light Emitting Diodes (LEDs) to improve target catch and reduce nontarget catch in northern shrimp  (Pandalus borealis) and Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) pot fisheries. Illuminated pots led to a significantly higher catch per unit effort (CPUE) of northern shrimp, but levels were still not commercially viable. LEDs also resulted in higher juvenile poor cod (Trisopterus minutus) bycatch and reduced Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) catch. LEDs on nets may be promising for increasing CPUE and an alternative to trawl fisheries for northern shrimp.

Effect on Bycatch: increase in poor cod (Trisopterus minutus)
Reference:
Horton, T. W., Enever, R., Godley, B. J., Kibel, P., Malone, D., McAndrew, D., & Doherty, P. D., 2025 , Effects of illumination and pot design on catch and bycatch when targeting northern shrimp (Pandalus borealis) using white LED PotLights

Bay of Biscay

Trawls
bony fishes: hake, blue whiting, mackerel
Acoustic deterrent devices
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters) Field study in the wild
Summary:

The authors evaluated the effectiveness of DDD®03H Dolphin Dissuasive Devices, or DDD pingers (an acoustic deterrent device) to reduce common dolphin (Delphinus delphis) bycatch in a demersal pair trawler in the Bay of Biscay. Results showed that the DDD pingers reduced common dolphin bycatch by more than 90%, and that common dolphin bycatch in this trawl fishery is related to fishing zone and depth, but not necessarily factors such as time of day and haul duration.

 

 

Effect on Bycatch: significantly reduced bycatch of common dolphin, both by frequency and # of individuals per haul
Reference:
Puente, E., Citores, L., Cuende, E., Krug, I. and Basterretxea, M., 2023 , Bycatch of short-beaked common dolphin (Delphinus delphis) in the pair bottom trawl fishery of the Bay of Biscay and its mitigation with an active acoustic deterrent device (pinger)

Summary study
Summary:

This summary study assessed data from pelagic longline fisheries and sea turtle bycatch across 40 nations in the year 2000. Analyses showed that ore than 200,000 loggerheads and 50,000 leatherbacks were likely taken as pelagic longline bycatch in 2000, which is not a sustainable level. 

 

Reference:
Lewis, R., Freeman, S., and Crowder, L. , 2004 , Quantifying the effects of fisheries on threatened species: the impact of pelagic longlines on loggerhead and leatherback sea turtles

Portugal

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
fish spp. Seabirds Field study in the wild
Summary:

This study utilized onboard observations and fishermen interviews to investigate seabird seasonal abundance and interactions with artisanal bottom-set net fisheries off the southern-eastern coast of mainland Portugal between 2020 and 2022. 25 species of seabirds were recorded as bycatch, with lesser black-backed and Yellow-legged gulls
(Larus fuscus and Larus michahellis) the most abundant. Great shearwaters (Ardenna gravis) were caught more frequently in trammel nets during autumn, suggesting effects of both season and gear type. Fishermen interviews identified Northern gannets and Great cormorants (Phalacrocorax carbo)
as the most frequently bycaught species,

 

 

Effect on Bycatch: variation by season and gear type affected seabird species differently
Reference:
Pereira, J.M., Ramos, J.A., Almeida, A., Marçalo, A., Carvalho, F., Fagundes, I., Gonçalves, J.M., Frade, M., Oliveira, N., Nascimento, T. and Paiva, V.H, 2025 , Seasonal variation in seabird abundance and bycatch at artisanal bottom-set net fisheries in the southern Iberian Atlantic coast

Summary study
Summary:

The authors used observer data to investigate variations in threatened species bycatch among individual operators with varying performance levels from five industrial fisheries in Australia. High-target and low-bycatch vessels were found in all five fisheries amongst varying gear types, and individual vessels were significant predictors of interaction rates. The authors suggest that fleet-wide bycatch reduction controls would be complemented through the use of measures that focus on individual performance groups.

 

Reference:
Roberson, L.A. and Wilcox, C., 2025 , Fishery bycatch rates largely driven by variation in individual vessel behaviour

Summary study
Summary:

The authors performed multuple analyses to assess northern fulmar (Fulmarus glacialis) bycatch and impacts from the Greenland halibut (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides) fishery in Arctic Canada. Results show that low to average levels of probable bycatch across fulmar populations will likely severely impede recovery or cause long-term declines of the northern fulmar populations in Arctic Canada, and that cumulative impacts of both southern and northern Canadian fisheries needed to be assessed for a more accurate understanding of the total impact. 

Reference:
Gutowsky, S.E., Morrill, A., Major, H.L., Mallory, M.L., Francis, C.M. and Provencher, J.F., 2025 , Does incidental fisheries bycatch in Canadian waters have population level impacts for northern fulmars breeding in Arctic Canada

Study in the lab
Summary:

The authors interviewed 779 fishers to assess the bycatch of Humboldt penguins (Spheniscus humboldti) in small-scale surface and bottom gillnet and purse-seine fisheries in Peru and Chile. Results estimated 4,067 penguins were caught as bycatch in 2023 alone, with the highest rates associated with the following: gillnets, location of larger penguin colonies, larger mesh sizes, and certain target species (i.e.  corvina drum (Seriolella violacea) and Peruvian grunt (Anisotremus scapularis)). Bycatch was reported in both gear types, but fisher responses as to the state and fate of caught penguins was scant and variable.

 

 

 Results showed an estimated total of 4067 (±889 s.d.) penguins
caught in 2023, with the highest bycatch associated with gillnets. Ports such as Tambo de Mora and
San José in Peru and Coquimbo and San Antonio in Chile reported the most significant interactions.
Spatial mapping demonstrated that areas with the most common bycatch events coincide with
locations of larger penguin colonies. Multiple correspondence analysis revealed that larger mesh
sizes (3–5 in (7.6 - 12.7 cm)) and certain target species, such as corvina drum (Seriolella violacea)
and Peruvian grunt (Anisotremus scapularis), were strongly associated with reported bycatch event

Reference:
Segura-Cobeña, E., Alfaro-Shigueto, J., Colodro, V., Gutiérrez-Guzmán, H., Arrese-Dávila, V., Torrejón-Zegarra, R., Vega, L., Custodio-Uribe, A., Peña-Cutimbo, N., Rodríguez-Salazar, J. and Messutto, D., 2025 , Use of rapid assessments of fishery bycatch of Humboldt penguins Spheniscus humboldti in Peru and Chile to help identify conservation priorities

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 53
  • Page 54
  • Page 55
  • Page 56
  • Current page 57
  • Page 58
  • Page 59
  • Page 60
  • Page 61
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »

©2026 Consortium for Wildlife Bycatch Reduction  |  All rights reserved

  • Home
  • About Us
  • What's Bycatch?
    • Species List
  • Database of Publications
    • Bycatch Reduction Techniques Fact Sheets
  • Research Programs
    • Consortium Publications
  • Our Donors and Partners
  • Funding Opportunities
  • Join the Exchange
  • News
  • Events
  • Log in