Skip to main content
Home

 

Register/Add a study

Menu

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Search The Database

Search The Database

Search Database Menu

  • View All Articles
  • Techniques Glossary
  • Fishing Gear Types
  • Add a Study
Displaying 191 - 200 of 568
Location Gear Catch Technique Bycatch species Type Results

Australia

Hooks-and-Lines
Bigeye tuna
Deep sets
Sea Turtles Field study in the wild
Summary:

Pelagic longlines were weighted with lead weights, enabling them to fish deeper in the water column than traditional pelagic longlines.  Weighted longlines caught 31 target species with a slightly higher catch per unit effort (CPUE) of 1.3 fish/100 hooks (49 kg/100 hooks) compared to traditional gear (38 target species and a CPUE of 1.08 fish/100 hooks or 41 kg/100 hooks).  Bigeye tuna CPUE for the weighted gear was higher, 0.95 fish/100 hooks (36 kg/100 hooks), than for traditional gear, 0.56/100 hooks (21 kg/100 hooks).  Swordfish CPUE was very similar for weighted (0.3 fish/100 hooks or 17 kg/100 hooks) and traditional (0.25 fish/100 hooks or 14 kg/100 hooks) gear.  This technique could be used to reduce sea turtle and other bycatch species interactions, however this was not tested during this initial trial study.

Effect on Bycatch: None reported
Reference:
Beverly, S., Robinson, E., Itano, D., 2004 , Trial setting of deep longline techniques to reduce bycatch and increase targeting of deep-swimming tunas

Izmir Bay, Turkey

Gillnets
Prawns
Sub-surface sets (gillnets)
Invertebrates Field study in the wild
Summary:

The number of floats and hanging ratio of trammel nets were altered in two experimental nets and compared to a standard trammel net to determine the impact on reducing the bycatch of purple dye murex, mantis shrimp and crabs.  The first experimental net had more floats than the control net in addition to a guarding net and the second experimental net had the same number of floats as the control net, with the addition of a guarding net.  During the first trial only experimental net 1 and the control net were compared and in the second trial all three nets were compared.  During the first trial, the experimental net caught 17% fewer prawns, the target species, 44% fewer crabs and mantis shrimp and 49% fewer murex than the control net.  During the second trial, experimental net 1 caught 66% fewer crabs, 27% fewer mantis shrimp and 32% fewer murex than the control net.  Experimental net 2 caught slightly fewer prawns (2%), 51% fewer crabs, 17% fewer mantis shrimp and 26% fewer murex than the control net. 

Effect on Bycatch: Trial 1, experimental net caught 44% fewer crabs and mantis shrimp and 49% fewer murex than control net. Trial 2, experimental net 1 caught 66% fewer crabs, 27% fewer mantis shrimp and 32% fewer murex, while experiemnetal net 2 caught 51% fewer crabs,
Reference:
Metin, C., Gikce, G., Aydin, I., Bayramic, I. , 2009 , Bycatch reduction in trammel net fishery for prawn (Melicertus kerathurus) by using guarding net in Izmir Bay on Aegean Coast of Turkey

Not a field study

Traps
Crab
Trap-net modification
Otters Summary study
Summary:

Sea otters are caught and drowned in fishing pots and traps.  Live California sea otters were exposed to finfish traps, lobster traps, and mock Dungeness crab traps in captive trials.  Researchers found that the otters attempted to enter the circular and rectangular fyke openings and some became entrapped.  They determined that a 3x9 inch opening, rather than the standard 4x9 inch, would prevent bycatch of free-living otters, while retaining crab catch.  

Effect on Bycatch: Prevents bycatch of weaned otters
Reference:
Hatfield, B., J. Ames, J. Estes, M. Tinker, A. Johnson, M. Staedler, and M. Harris, 2011 , Sea otter mortality in fish and shellfish traps: estimating potential impacts and exploring possible solutions

Brazil

Hooks-and-Lines
tuna (pelagic) and sharks (bottom)
Circle hooks
Sharks, Skates/Rays Field study in the wild
Summary:

The type (circle 18/0 0 degree offset and J-style 9/0 10 degree offset) and position of hooks in the water column were tested to determine the effects on catch rates and mortality of elasmobranchs.  Tests were conducted aboard pelagic and bottom longline vessels. CPUEs for blue, silky and oceanic whitetip sharks were significantly higher with circle hooks than with J-style hooks. Silky, blue and oceanic whitetip sharks had a significantly higher mortality at haulback with J-style hooks.  Significant differences in hooking location between the two hook types was found for night, blue, silky and oceanic whitetip sharks. These sharks were more commonly hooked externally vs internally.  No significant differences between hook types was found for the CPUE's on bottom longlines.  Significantly more blacknose were alive at haulback when circle hooks were used on bottom longlines. Bottom longlines were also used to test for differences in CPUE by fishing depth.  Demersal hooks had significantly higher CPUE's than those suspended in the water column for blacknose and nurse sharks and southern stingrays.

Effect on Bycatch: CPUE was significantly higher for night, blue, silky, and oceanic whitetip sharks on circle hooks.
Reference:
Afonso, A., Hazin, F., Carvalho, F., Pacheco, J., Hazin, H., Kerstetter, D., Murie, D., Burgess, G., 2011 , Fishing gear modifications to reduce elasmobranch mortality in pelagic and bottom longline fisheries off Northeast Brazil

British Columbia, Canada

Gillnets
Salmon Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise) Summary study
Summary:

Small cetaceans are by-caught in salmon gillnet fisheries in British Columbia (BC) waters. In Canada, there is currently no generic calculation to identify when management action is necessary to reduce cetacean bycatch below sustainable limits. We estimated potential anthropogenic mortality limits for harbour (Phocoena phocoena) and Dall’s (Phocoenoides dalli) porpoises and Pacific white-sided dolphins (Lagenorhynchus obliquidens) using quantitative objectives from two well-established frameworks for conservation and management (the United States’ Marine Mammal Protection Act and the Agreement on the Conservation of Small Cetaceans of the Baltic and North Seas), which are similar to some management objectives developed for marine mammal stocks elsewhere in Canada. Limits were calculated as functions of (i) a minimum abundance estimate (2004–2005); (ii) maximum rate of population increase; and (iii) uncertainty factors to account for bias in abundance estimates and uncertainty in mortality estimates. Best estimates of bycatch mortality in 2004 and 2005 exceeded only the most precautionary limits and only for porpoise species. Future research priority should be given to determining small cetacean stock structure in BC and refining species-specific entanglement rates in these and other fisheries. The approach offers a quantitative framework for Canada to meet its stated objectives to maintain favourable conservation status of cetacean populations.

Reference:
Williams, R., Hall, A., Winship, A., 2008 , Potential limits to anthropogenic mortality of small cetaceans in coastal waters of British Columbia

Hawaii

Hooks-and-Lines
Bigeye tuna
Circle hooks
Bony Fishes, Elasmobranchs Field study in the wild
Summary:

Tests were conducted aboard deep-set Hawaii tuna longline vessels to determine differences in catches, fish size selectivity and survival on 18/0 circle hooks vs. Japanese style tuna hooks size 3.6 sun and vs. 9/0 "J" hooks.  There were no significant differences in catch, catch rate or mean length between hook types for bigeye tuna (the primary target) but catch rates on circle hooks were lower for 16 other species than on the Japanese style tuna hook and for 8 species on the "J" hook.  Fish length was significantly shorter on Japanese style tuna hooks for four species compared to circle hooks and four 3 species on "J" hooks.  Survival was significantly higher for 6 species, including bigeye tuna, on circle hooks compared to Japanese style hooks and for five species on "J" hooks.

Effect on Bycatch: Catch rates on circle hooks were significantly lower than on Japanese style and "J" hooks for 16 and 8 species respectively. Fish length was significantly shorter for four species on Japanese style hooks and for three species on "J" hooks. Survival was
Reference:
Curran, D. and Bigelow, K., 2011 , Effects of circle hooks on pelagic catches in the Hawaii-based tuna longline fishery

Florida

Trawls
Shrimp
Excluder devices
Bony Fishes Field study in the wild
Summary:

Two bycatch reduction devices (BRD), the Florida fisheye (FFE) and large-mesh extended-mesh funnel (EMF) were tested in roller-frame trawls to determine their effectiveness in reducing bycatch.  Tests were conducted at two locations (Tarpon Springs and Biscayne Bay, FL) using a paired trawl design with the BRD equipped net deployed off one side and the control net off the other side.  The FFE did not significantly reduce overall finfish bycatch but did retain shrimp at both locations.  At Tarpon Springs, the EMF reduced bycatch significantly and shrimp loss was low, while at Biscayne Bay, bycatch and shrimp loss were both significantly reduced. A simulator cone was also tested with both BRD's at Tarpon Springs and resulted in significant bycatch reduction but also significant shirmp loss.

Effect on Bycatch: Florida fisheye bycatch reduction device (BRD) did not significantly reduce finfish bycatch. The large-mesh extended-mesh funnel BRD significantly reduced bycatch. The simulator cone (used with both BRD's) significantly reduced bycatch.
Reference:
Crawford, C.R., Steele, P., McMillen-Jackson, A.L., Bert, T.M., 2011 , Effectiveness of bycatch-reduction devices in roller-frame trawls used in the Florida shrimp fishery

Hawaii

Hooks-and-Lines
Bigeye tuna
Deep sets
Bony Fishes Field study in the wild
Summary:

Tests were conducted in the Hawaii-based tuna longline fishery to determine if removing the shallowest hooks from pelagic longline sets would maximize the catches of target species while minimizing the incidental catch of non-target species.  Catch rates of bigeye tuna were not significantly different between the two set types but catch rates of sickle pomfret were significantly higher in experimental compared to control sets.  Statistically fewer wahoo, dolphinfish, blue marlin, striped marlin and shortbill spearfish were caught on the experimental sets. 

Effect on Bycatch: Statistically more sickle pomfret and fewer wahoo, dolphinfish, blue marlin, striped marlin and shortbill spearfish were caught on the experimental compared to the control sets
Reference:
Beverly, S., Curran, D., Musyl, M. and Molony, B., 2009 , Effects of eliminating shallow hooks from tuna longline sets on target and non-target species in the Hawaii-based pelagic tuna fishery

Western Australia

Trawls
Red emperor, scarlet perch, spangled emperor, Rankin cod, blue spot emperor, rosy threadfin brea, flagfish, frypan snapper, red snapper and goldband snapper
Excluder devices
Elasmobranchs Field study in the wild
Summary: A semi-flexible exclusion grid with a bar spacing of 15.5 cm reduced dolphin bycatch in the Pilbara trawl fishery by close to 50% and reduced the bycatch of sea turtles, large sharks and rays. However, the fate of the dolphins that encountered the grid and escaped is unknown.
Effect on Bycatch: No rays larger than 120 cm were caught when the grid was used
Reference:
Stephenson, P.C., Wells, S., King, J.A., 2008 , Evaluation of exclusion grids to reduce the bycatch of dolphins, turtles, sharks and rays in the Pilbara trawl fishery

Northern Australia

Trawls
Prawns
Excluder devices
Elasmobranchs Field study in the wild
Summary:

Tests were conducted to determine if twin trawl nets containing a Turtle Excluder Device (TED) and a Popeye Fishbox caught less bycatch then nets fitted only with a TED. Nets that had the Popeye Fishbox located 70 meshes from the codend draw strings had a 48% reduction in the weight of small bycatch, an 87% reduction in number of sea snakes and a 35% reduction in the number of sharks and rays caught. When the Popeye Fishbox was placed 100 meshes from the codend draw strings, the weight of small bycatch was reduced by 28% and the number of sharks and rays was reduced by 27%. No analysis of sea snake bycatch at this distance was carried out. There was no significant difference in the catch of targeted prawns between nets with and without the Popeye Fishbox.

Effect on Bycatch: Reduced the number of sharks and rays by 35% when the Popeye Fishbox was placed 70 meshes from the codend draw strings and by 27% when it was placed 100 meshes from the codend draw strings
Reference:
Raudzen, E., 2007 , At sea testing of the Popeye Fishbox bycatch reduction device onboard the FV Adelaide Pearl for approval in Australia's northern prawn fishery

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 16
  • Page 17
  • Page 18
  • Page 19
  • Current page 20
  • Page 21
  • Page 22
  • Page 23
  • Page 24
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »

©2022 Consortium for Wildlife Bycatch Reduction  |  All rights reserved

  • Home
  • About Us
  • What's Bycatch?
    • Species List
  • Database of Publications
    • Bycatch Reduction Techniques Fact Sheets
  • Research Programs
    • Consortium Publications
  • Our Donors and Partners
  • Funding Opportunities
  • Join the Exchange
  • News
  • Events
  • Log in