Skip to main content
Home

 

Register/Add a study

Menu

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Search The Database

Search The Database

Search Database Menu

  • View All Articles
  • Techniques Glossary
  • Fishing Gear Types
  • Add a Study
Displaying 201 - 210 of 568
Location Gear Catch Technique Bycatch species Type Results

North Carolina

Gillnets
Spanish mackerel, menhaden, spot
Tensioning gillnet
Sharks Field study in the wild
Summary:

Gillnets with three difference mesh sizes (2 7/8", 3" and 4") were modified to use 200 lbs/200 yard lead line and 11 oz buoyancy floats (versus 50lbs/200 yard lead line and 3 oz floats) to increase the tension in the net. Catch rates of Atlantic sharpnose and bonnethead sharks were significantly lower in the 4" modified net. The proportion of hammer-wrapped bonnethead sharks was significantly higher in the 4" unmodified net and significantly less blacktip sharks were wrapped in the 3" modified net. Selectivity of blacknose sharks varied between the modified and unmodified nets. Catch rates of targeted Spanish mackerel and spot were not significantly different between modified and unmodified nets.

Effect on Bycatch: Catch rates of Atlantic sharpnose sharks were significantly lower in the 4" modified net
Reference:
Thorpe, T., Pabst, D.A., Beresoff, D. , 2001 , Assessment of modified gillnets as a means to reduce bycatch in southeastern North Carolina coastal waters

Northwest Africa

Trawls
Sardinella
Excluder devices
Skates/Rays Field study in the wild
Summary:

The addition of a filter grid (inclined at ca. 20 degrees) that leads to an escape tunnel in trawl nets allowed 100% of rays and turtles to escape, 75% of manta rays, 40% of billfish and between 20-75% of sharks to escape.

Effect on Bycatch: Allowed 100% of rays to escape
Reference:
Zeeberg, J., Corten, A., Graff, E., 2006 , Bycatch and release of pelagic megafauna in industrial trawler fisheries off Northwest Africa

Northwest Africa

Trawls
Sardinella
Excluder devices
Sharks Field study in the wild
Summary:

The addition of a filter grid (inclined at ca. 20 degrees) that leads to an escape tunnel in trawl nets allowed 100% of rays and turtles to escape, 75% of manta rays, 40% of billfish and between 20-75% of sharks to escape.

Effect on Bycatch: Allowed between 20-75% of sharks to escape
Reference:
Zeeberg, J., Corten, A., Graff, E., 2006 , Bycatch and release of pelagic megafauna in industrial trawler fisheries off Northwest Africa

Northwest Africa

Trawls
Sardinella
Excluder devices
Bony Fishes Field study in the wild
Summary:

The addition of a filter grid (inclined at ca. 20 degrees) that leads to an escape tunnel in trawl nets allowed 100% of rays and turtles to escape, 75% of manta rays, 40% of billfish and between 20-75% of sharks to escape.

Effect on Bycatch: Allowed 40% of billfish to escape
Reference:
Zeeberg, J., Corten, A., Graff, E., 2006 , Bycatch and release of pelagic megafauna in industrial trawler fisheries off Northwest Africa

Northern Australia

Trawls
Prawns
Excluder devices
Sea Turtles Field study in the wild
Summary:

The catches from five experimental trawls (TED + fisheye BRD, upward facing TED, downward facing TED, bigeye BRD and square-mesh panel BRD) were compared to those of the standard twin Florida Flyer prawn trawl. Nets with a combination of a TED and BRD reduced sea turtle catches by 100%, large sponges by 85.3%, sharks by 36.3% and rays by 17.7% and reduced the proportion of soft and damaged prawns by 41.6% and catches of tiger prawns by 6.5%. Upward and downward facing TED's reduced sea turtle bycatch by 99% and 100% respectively and large sponges by 81.6% and 95.9% respectively. Catches of tiger prawns were reduced by 6.3% with the use of TED's. The BRD's had little impact on the catch of either the target or bycatch species.

Effect on Bycatch: Upward facing TED's reduced sea turtle bycatch by 99%
Reference:
Brewer, D., Heales, D., Milton, D., Dell, Q., Fry, G., Venables, B., Jones, P., 2006 , The impact of turtle excluder devices and bycatch reduction devices on diverse tropical marine communities in Australia's northern prawn trawl fishery

Baltic

Gillnets
None reported
Acoustic deterrent devices
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise) Field study in the wild
Summary: Authors investigated the spatial and temporal responses of porpoises to simulated bottom-set nets equipped with periodically operating Dukane NetMark 1000 pingers.
Effect on Bycatch: Pingers significantly reduced echolocation encounter rates by 50-100% at 500m; sighting reduced up to 375m. Porpoise return time was 6 hrs when pingers were silent after being active for 24 hrs 50 min
Reference:
Carlstrom J., Berggren P., Tregenza N.J.C, 2009 , Spatial and temporal impact of pingers on porpoises

South Africa

Hooks-and-Lines
tuna
Bird-scaring devices
Seabirds Field study in the wild
Summary:

Two types of streamer lines, a "light" with short streamers and a "hybrid" with mixed long and short streamers, were tested in the Japanese joint venture tuna fishery that operates in the South African EEZ.  The authors also looked at differences in catch rates between weighted and unweighted branchlines. The mean total attack rate was similar for each design but diving birds attacked further astern in response to both tori line types compared to surface foraging birds.  The "hybrid" line did not allow attacks by divers within 50 m but the "light" line allowed attacks through out all distances astern monitored. Surface foragers did not attack within 0-25 m of the "hybrid" line or at distances greater than 100 m of the "light" line.  Catch rates of birds were higher on unweighted compared to weighted branchlines.  Catch rates of fish were not significantly different between the two branchline types at night or during the dawn.

Effect on Bycatch: The mean total attack rate was similar for each design but diving birds attacked further astern in response to both tori line types compared to surface foraging birds. The "hybrid" line did not allow attacks by divers within 50 m but the "light" line al
Reference:
Melvin, E.F, T.J. Guy and L.B. Read, 2010 , Shrink and defend: a comparison of two streamer line designs in the 2009 South Africa tuna fishery

South Africa

Hooks-and-Lines
tuna
Sub-surface bait setting
Seabirds Field study in the wild
Summary:

Two types of streamer lines, a "light" with short streamers and a "hybrid" with mixed long and short streamers, were tested in the Japanese joint venture tuna fishery that operates in the South African EEZ.  The authors also looked at differences in catch rates between weighted and unweighted branchlines. The mean total attack rate was similar for each design but diving birds attacked further astern in response to both tori line types compared to surface foraging birds.  The "hybrid" line did not allow attacks by divers within 50 m but the "light" line allowed attacks through out all distances astern monitored. Surface foragers did not attack within 0-25 m of the "hybrid" line or at distances greater than 100 m of the "light" line.  Catch rates of birds were higher on unweighted compared to weighted branchlines.  Catch rates of fish were not significantly different between the two branchline types at night or during the dawn.

Effect on Bycatch: Catch rates of birds were higher on unweighted compared to weighted branchlines.
Reference:
Melvin, E.F, T.J. Guy and L.B. Read, 2010 , Shrink and defend: a comparison of two streamer line designs in the 2009 South Africa tuna fishery

South-western Atlantic Ocean

Hooks-and-Lines
Tuna, blue sharks, swordfish
Circle hooks
Caretta caretta (Loggerhead turtle), Demochelys coriacea (Leatherback sea turtle) Field study in the wild
Summary:

The effectiveness of 18/0 circle hooks, compared to 9/0 J-type hooks, in decreasing the incidental capture and post-release mortaliity of sea turtles was tested in the Brazilian pelagic longline fishery operating in the south-western Atlantic Ocean.  The incidental capture of loggerhead sea turtles was reduced by 55% and for leatherback sea turtles by 65% when circle hooks were used.  De-hooking also decreased from 25% to 5.8% in loggerhead sea turtles when circle hooks were used, likely increasing their post-release survival rates.  Catch rates of targeted species including bigeye and albacore tuna and blue sharks increased with the use of circle hooks, while no difference in catch rates between hook types was found for yellowfin tuna, shortfin mako or hammerhead sharks or for dolphinfish.  However, swordfish, another target species, catch rates were significantly reduced with the use of circle hooks.

Effect on Bycatch: The incidental capture of loggerhead sea turtles was reduced by 55% and for leatherback sea turtles by 65% when circle hooks were used.

Mazaltan, Mexico

Hooks-and-Lines
Pelagic species
Circle hooks
Field study in the wild
Summary:

Four types of hooks, J-style, tuna hook, tuna 18 offset and circle hooks were tested on pelagic loglines fishing close to Mazatlan Mexico to determine their effectiveness at catching sharks and other pelagic species.  Circle hooks had the highest catch rates for the principal target species, blue and striped marlin.

Effect on Bycatch: None reported

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 17
  • Page 18
  • Page 19
  • Page 20
  • Current page 21
  • Page 22
  • Page 23
  • Page 24
  • Page 25
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »

©2022 Consortium for Wildlife Bycatch Reduction  |  All rights reserved

  • Home
  • About Us
  • What's Bycatch?
    • Species List
  • Database of Publications
    • Bycatch Reduction Techniques Fact Sheets
  • Research Programs
    • Consortium Publications
  • Our Donors and Partners
  • Funding Opportunities
  • Join the Exchange
  • News
  • Events
  • Log in