Skip to main content
Home

 

Register/Add a study

Menu

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Search The Database

Search The Database

Search Database Menu

  • View All Articles
  • Techniques Glossary
  • Fishing Gear Types
  • Add a Study
Displaying 81 - 90 of 567
Location Gear Catch Technique Bycatch species Type Results

Scotland

Gillnets
Trout
Metal oxide/barium sulfate nets
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise) Field study in the wild
Summary:

Acoustic pingers placed in the rear of a pair trawl net in the United Kingdom bass pair trawl fishery did not reduce bycatch of common dolphins (Delphinus delphis). Multi-monofilament net, placed in the North Sea and West of Scotland gillnet fisheries, had no significant impact on harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) bycatch when compared to traditional monofilament net. Thin twine monofilament nets (.4mm twine diameter, 90 mm mesh size) reduced bycatch of harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) and seals in the North Sea and West of Scotland gillnet fisheries when compared to thick (.6mm twine diameter, 267 mm mesh size) monofilament nets. Barium sulphate nets had higher bycatch of harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) and seals in the North Sea and West of Scotland gillnet fisheries when compared to traditional gillnets.

Effect on Bycatch: Increased bycatch
Reference:
Northridge, S., D. Sanderson, A. Mackay, and P. Hammond, 2003 , Analysis and mitigation of cetacean bycatch in UK fisheries

Scotland

Gillnets
Scallop
Metal oxide/barium sulfate nets
Pinnipeds Field study in the wild
Summary:

Acoustic pingers placed in the rear of a pair trawl net in the United Kingdom bass pair trawl fishery did not reduce bycatch of common dolphins (Delphinus delphis). Multi-monofilament net, placed in the North Sea and West of Scotland gillnet fisheries, had no significant impact on harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) bycatch when compared to traditional monofilament net. Thin twine monofilament nets (.4mm twine diameter, 90 mm mesh size) reduced bycatch of harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) and seals in the North Sea and West of Scotland gillnet fisheries when compared to thick (.6mm twine diameter, 267 mm mesh size) monofilament nets. Barium sulphate nets had higher bycatch of harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) and seals in the North Sea and West of Scotland gillnet fisheries when compared to traditional gillnets.

Effect on Bycatch: Increased bycatch
Reference:
Northridge, S., D. Sanderson, A. Mackay, and P. Hammond, 2003 , Analysis and mitigation of cetacean bycatch in UK fisheries

Florida

Traps
Crab
Trap guards (T-bars, otter guards)
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters) Field study in the wild
Summary: Trap guards, made of bungee cords, reduced interactions between bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) and the Indian River Lagoon blue crab (Callinectes sapidus) pot fishery.
Effect on Bycatch: Reduced interactions with gear
Reference:
Noke, W.D., and D.K. Odell, 2002 , Interactions between the Indian River Lagoon blue crab fishery and the bottlenose dolphin, Tursiops truncatus

Baltic Sea

Traps
Salmon and whitefish
Trap-net modification
Pinnipeds Field study in the wild
Summary: A trap-net modification reduced seal-induced [Grey seal (Halichoerus grypus) and Ringed seal (Phoca hispida botnica)] catch and gear damage in the northern Baltic Sea trap-net fishery for salmon (Salmo salar) and whitefish (Coregonus lavaretus). Target catch remained the same or increased in four of five modified traps.
Effect on Bycatch: Reduced interactions with gear
Reference:
Suuronen, P., A. Siira, T. Kauppinen, R. Riikonen, E. Lehtonen, and H. Harjunpaa, 2006 , Reduction of seal-induced catch and gear damage by modification of trap-net design: Design principles for a seal-safe trap net

South Africa

Hooks-and-Lines
Patagonian toothfish
Sub-surface sets (gillnets)
Seabirds Field study in the wild
Summary: An underwater setting funnel, used in conjunction with a bird-scaring line, reduced bycatch of albatross and petrel seabirds in the demersal longline fishery for Patagonian toothfish (Dissostichus eleginoides) off of the sub-Antarctic South African Prince Edward Islands. Although fish rates were not compared between sets with and without the funnel, it is predicted fish catch would improve with the use of the funnels as fishing would be permitted during the day in addition to current nighttime fishing.
Effect on Bycatch: Reduced bycatch
Reference:
Ryan, P.G. and B.P. Watkins, 2002 , Reducing incidental mortality of seabirds with an underwater longline setting funnel

Gulf of Mexico

Trawls
shrimp
Excluder devices
Bony Fishes Field study in the wild
Summary: Three of four bycatch reduction devices placed on shrimp (Penaeus aztecus and Penaeus setiferus) trawls in the Gulf of Mexico reduced bycatch of fish species but also reduced catch of shrimp. The fourth bycatch reduction device increased catch of shrimp and fish when compared with control nets.
Effect on Bycatch: Reduced bycatch in 3 of 4 bycatch reduction devices
Reference:
Rogers, D.R., B.D. Rogers, J.A. de Silva, and V.L. Wright, 1997 , Effectiveness of four industry-developed bycatch reduction devices in Louisiana's inshore waters

Gulf of California

Trawls
shrimp
Excluder devices
Bony Fishes Field study in the wild
Summary:

A square mesh/extended funnel bycatch reduction device (BRD) tested in the bottom trawl shrimp fishery in the Gulf of California decreased bycatch by 40% when compared to control trawls. On average, the BRD excluded 37% of finfish species, including the endangered Totoaba macdonaldi, but it also reduced shrimp catch by approximately 7%.

Effect on Bycatch: Reduced bycatch
Reference:
Garcia-Caudillo J.M. , M.A. Cisneros-Mata, and A. Balmori-Ramirez, 2000 , Performance of a bycatch reduction device in the shrimp fishery of the Gulf of California, Mexico

Australia

Trawls
Shrimp and scallop Invertebrates Field study in the wild
Summary: Modified ground gear, known as batwing otter boards, created less disturbance to the seafloor than traditional otter boards in the Australian prawn trawl fishery, decreasing bycatch of benthic squirts and starfish by approximately 85-90%. The target catch of both prawns and scallops decreased by about 10%. Modified ground gear, called soft-brush ground gear, reduced bycatch of starfish by 35% but increased bycatch of nektobenthic species including small crabs and non-target prawns in the Australian prawn trawl fishery. The target catch of prawns decreased 10% while scallop catch increased 10%.
Effect on Bycatch: Reduced bycatch
Reference:
Sterling, D. and S. Eayrs, , Design and assessment of two gear modifications to reduce the benthic impact and fuel intensity of prawn trawling in Australia

Australia

Trawls
Shrimp and scallop Invertebrates Field study in the wild
Summary: Modified ground gear, known as batwing otter boards, created less disturbance to the seafloor than traditional otter boards in the Australian prawn trawl fishery, decreasing bycatch of benthic squirts and starfish by approximately 85-90%. The target catch of both prawns and scallops decreased by about 10%. Modified ground gear, called soft-brush ground gear, reduced bycatch of starfish by 35% but increased bycatch of nektobenthic species including small crabs and non-target prawns in the Australian prawn trawl fishery. The target catch of prawns decreased 10% while scallop catch increased 10%.
Effect on Bycatch: Reduced bycatch of starfish but increased bycatch of nektobenthic species
Reference:
Sterling, D. and S. Eayrs, , Design and assessment of two gear modifications to reduce the benthic impact and fuel intensity of prawn trawling in Australia

Chesapeake Bay

Traps
Crab
Trap guards (T-bars, otter guards)
Sea Turtles Field study in the wild
Summary: A trap modification reduced bycatch of diamondback terrapins (Malaclemys terrapin) in a blue crab (Callinectes sepidus) pot fishery in the Patuxent River, a tributary of the Chesapeake Bay. Three wire modifications were tested and found that terrapin bycatch can be reduced without decreasing the number or size of captured crabs.
Effect on Bycatch: Reduced turtle bycatch
Reference:
Roosenburg, W.M. and J.P. Green, 2000 , Impact of a bycatch reduction device on diamondback terrapin and blue crab capture in crab pots

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Current page 9
  • Page 10
  • Page 11
  • Page 12
  • Page 13
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »

©2022 Consortium for Wildlife Bycatch Reduction  |  All rights reserved

  • Home
  • About Us
  • What's Bycatch?
    • Species List
  • Database of Publications
    • Bycatch Reduction Techniques Fact Sheets
  • Research Programs
    • Consortium Publications
  • Our Donors and Partners
  • Funding Opportunities
  • Join the Exchange
  • News
  • Events
  • Log in