Skip to main content
Home

 

Register/Add a study

Menu

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Search The Database

Search The Database

Search Database Menu

  • View All Articles
  • Techniques Glossary
  • Fishing Gear Types
  • Add a Study
Displaying 61 - 70 of 567
Location Gear Catch Technique Bycatch species Type Results

Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico

Trawls
shrimp
Excluder devices
Sea Turtles Field study in the wild
Summary: Turtle Excluder Devices reduce sea turtle bycatch in the Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico shrimp trawl fishery.
Effect on Bycatch: Reduced bycatch
Reference:
Renaud, M., J. Nance, E. Scott-Denton, and G.R. Gitschlag, 1997 , Incidental capture of sea turtles in shrimp trawls with and without TEDs in U.S. Atlantic and Gulf Waters

New Zealand

Trawls
Hoki Pinnipeds Field study in the wild
Summary:

Acoustic Harassment Devices were not found to be effective in deterring New Zealand fur seals (Arctocephalus forsteri) from mid-water trawls in the New Zealand hoki fishery. Sea Lion Escape Devices are undergoing testing in New Zealand˙s hoki trawl fishery (for fur seals) and the squid trawl fishery (for Hookers˙s sea lion). Preliminary results indicate squid and fish loss via the escape hatch was minimal; in the hoki fishery, fish loss was confined to fast swimming species, including jack mackerel and warehou.

Effect on Bycatch: Did not deter fur seals
Reference:
Stewardson, C.L. and M.W. Cawthorn, 2004 , Technologies to reduce seal-fisheries interactions and mortalities

New Zealand

Trawls
Hoki
Excluder devices
Pinnipeds Field study in the wild
Summary:

Acoustic Harassment Devices were not found to be effective in deterring New Zealand fur seals (Arctocephalus forsteri) from mid-water trawls in the New Zealand hoki fishery. Sea Lion Escape Devices are undergoing testing in New Zealand˙s hoki trawl fishery (for fur seals) and the squid trawl fishery (for Hookers˙s sea lion). Preliminary results indicate squid and fish loss via the escape hatch was minimal; in the hoki fishery, fish loss was confined to fast swimming species, including jack mackerel and warehou.

Reference:
Stewardson, C.L. and M.W. Cawthorn, 2004 , Technologies to reduce seal-fisheries interactions and mortalities

Atlantic

Hooks-and-Lines
Swordfish and tuna
Circle hooks
Caretta caretta (Loggerhead turtle), Demochelys coriacea (Leatherback sea turtle) Field study in the wild
Summary: Circle hooks significantly reduce loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and leatherback (Dermocheles coriacea) sea turtle bycatch in Atlantic longline fisheries. Swordfish catch decreased when circle hooks were baited with squid but increased when baited with mackerel. Tuna catch increased when circle hooks were baited with squid but decreased when baited with mackerel.
Effect on Bycatch: Reduced bycatch
Reference:
Watson, J.W., D. Foster, S. Epperly, and A. Shah, 2004 , Experiments in the Western Atlantic Northeast Distant Waters to Evaluate Sea Turtle Mitigation Measures in the Pelagic Longline Fishery. Report on Experiments Conducted in 2001-2003

Azores

Hooks-and-Lines
Swordfish and blue shark
Circle hooks
Caretta caretta (Loggerhead turtle) Field study in the wild
Summary:

Circle hooks (non-offset 16/0 and 18/0) did not significantly reduce the number of loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) caught in the Azores longline swordfish and blue shark fishery when compared with non-offset and offset 9/0 J hooks. Use of circle hooks decreased the rate of throat hooking in loggerhead sea turtles. Circle hooks (non-offset 16/0 and 18/0) caught significantly more blue sharks than J hooks in the Azores longline swordfish and blue shark fisheries. 

Effect on Bycatch: Did not reduce bycatch; reduced rate of throat hooking
Reference:
Bolton, A. and K. Bjorndal, 2003 , Experiment to Evaluate Gear Modification on Rates of Sea Turtle Bycatch in the Swordfish Longline Fishery in the Azores Phase 2

Azores

Hooks-and-Lines
Swordfish and blue shark
Circle hooks
Caretta caretta (Loggerhead turtle) Field study in the wild
Summary:

There was no significant difference in the number of loggerhead sea turtles caught in the Azores longline swordfish and blue shark fishery between straight 16/0, offset 16/0, and offset 18/0 circle hooks. Circle hooks decreased the rate of throat hooking in loggerhead sea turtles caught in the Azores longline swordfish and blue shark fishery. Straight 16/0 circle hooks caught the most blue sharks in the Azores longline swordfish and blue shark fishery, followed by offset 18/0 circle hooks. Offset 16/0 circle hooks caught the fewest blue sharks.

Effect on Bycatch: Decreased throat hooking
Reference:
Bolton, A. and K. Bjorndal, 2004 , Experiment to Evaluate Gear Modification on Rates of Sea Turtle Bycatch in the Swordfish Longline Fishery in the Azores Phase 3

Azores

Hooks-and-Lines
Swordfish and blue shark
Circle hooks
Caretta caretta (Loggerhead turtle) Field study in the wild
Summary:

Japanese tuna hook 3.6mm S/S caught significantly more loggerhead sea turtles than non-offset 16/0 and 18/0 circle hooks and caught more turtles in the throat than the circle hooks in the Azores longline swordfish and blue shark fishery. Non-offset 18/0 circle hooks caught fewer loggerhead sea turtles than non-offset 16/0 circle hooks in the Azores longline swordfish and blue shark fishery. There was no significant difference in the number of blue sharks caught on non-offset 16/0 and 18/0 circle hooks in the Azores longline swordfish and blue shark fishery.

Effect on Bycatch: Non-offset 16/0 and 18/0 circle hooks caught fewer turtles than Japanese tuna hook. Non-offset 18/0 circle hooks caught fewer turtles than non-offset 16/0
Reference:
Bolton, A. and K. Bjorndal, 2005 , Experiment to Evaluate Gear Modification on Rates of Sea Turtle Bycatch in the Swordfish Longline Fishery in the Azores Phase 4

Azores

Hooks-and-Lines
Swordfish and blue shark
Circle hooks
Sea Turtles Field study in the wild
Summary:

Circle hooks (non-offset 16/0 and 18/0) caught significantly more blue sharks than J hooks in the Azores longline swordfish and blue shark fisheries.

Reference:
Bolten, A. and K. Bjorndal, 2002 , Experiment to Evaluate Gear Modification on Rates of Sea Turtle Bycatch in the Swordfish Longline Fishery in the Azores

Atlantic

Hooks-and-Lines
Swordfish and tuna
Dyed bait
Caretta caretta (Loggerhead turtle), Demochelys coriacea (Leatherback sea turtle) Field study in the wild
Summary: Blue-dyed bait does not significantly reduce loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and leatherback (Dermocheles coriacea)sea turtle captures in the western Atlantic longline fishery.
Effect on Bycatch: Did not reduce bycatch
Reference:
Watson, J., D. Foster, S. Epperly, and A. Shah, 2002 , Experiments in the Western Atlantic Northeast Distant Waters to Evaluate Sea Turtle Mitigation Measures in the Pelagic Longline Fishery. Report on Experiments Conducted in 2001

Canada

Gillnets
Multiple species
Metal oxide/barium sulfate nets
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise), Seabirds Field study in the wild
Summary: Metal oxide nets containing barium sulphate (that increased their acoustic reflectivity and probably also their stiffness) reduced the bycatch of harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) in an eastern Canada demersal gillnet fishery. No difference in catch of commercial fish species, including cod, pollock, haddock, and spiny dogfish, was observed between the nylon and barium sulphate nets. Metal oxide nets reduced the bycatch of greater shearwater (Puffinus gravis) in an eastern Canada demersal gillnet fishery, probably by increasing the visibility of the blue-dyed nets to the birds.
Effect on Bycatch: Reduced harbor porpoise bycatch
Reference:
Trippel, E.A., N.L. Holy, D.L. Palka, T.D. Shepherd, G.D. Melvin, and J.M. Terhune, 2003 , Nylon barium sulphate gillnet reduces porpoise and seabird mortality

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Current page 7
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • Page 10
  • Page 11
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »

©2022 Consortium for Wildlife Bycatch Reduction  |  All rights reserved

  • Home
  • About Us
  • What's Bycatch?
    • Species List
  • Database of Publications
    • Bycatch Reduction Techniques Fact Sheets
  • Research Programs
    • Consortium Publications
  • Our Donors and Partners
  • Funding Opportunities
  • Join the Exchange
  • News
  • Events
  • Log in