Skip to main content
Home

 

Register/Add a study

Menu

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Search The Database

Search The Database

Search Database Menu

  • View All Articles
  • Techniques Glossary
  • Fishing Gear Types
  • Add a Study
Displaying 631 - 632 of 632
Location Gear Catch Technique Bycatch species Type Results

Aegean coast, Türkiye

Hooks and Lines
Multi-species
Circle hooks
Sea Turtles, Caretta caretta (Loggerhead turtle), Chelonia mydas (Green sea turtle) Field study in the wild
Summary:

Paired trials were conducted to compare standard gillnet, trammel nets, and set longlines in Türkiye with several different types of modifications: LED (LP Electralume, 520–530 nm; 18,000–20,000 mcd) and UV-LED devices (LP Electralume, 395–400 nm; 12,000 mcd) and C-type fishing hooks. 

Compared to control nets, LED and UV-illuminated gillnets and trammel nets reduced the biomass of commercial species catch  by 54-75%, and there was no significant reduction in the catch of vulnerable species, including elasmobranchs and sea turtles.  Circle hooks reduced commercial catch by 77% compared to standard J-hooks and similarly had a higher proportion of vulnerable species (noting no sea turtles were captured in the control or treatment longline sets). 

These somewhat unexpected findings may have been influenced by study design limitations (small sample size) or other variables, including high turbidity and larger gear mesh sizes. Additional research is planned. 

Effect on Bycatch: No reduction in catch of vulnerable species; sea turtles were not encountered in either control or treatment sets
Reference:
Kaska, Y., Sozbilen, D., Vezard, M.A., Casale, P., Kaykal, M.H., Tosunoglu, Z., Possardt, E. , 2026 , Preliminary Study Finds LEDs, UV Lights, and C-Type Hooks May Reduce Sustainability in Aegean Small-Scale Fisheries

Conception Bay, Canada

Pots
Snow crab (Chionoecetes opilio)
Excluder devices
Crustaceans, Chionoecetes opilio (Snow crab) Field study in the wild
Summary:

Four experimental snow crab (Chionoecetes opilio) conical pots with non-selective, small mesh jackets  and collars of 180 mm, 240 mm, 300 mm, and 180 mm with a 51 mm lip, were compared with small mesh pots with no collar and traditional pots with traditional mesh in Conception Bay, Canada. Smaller collars did not improve catch efficiency (but did not significantly reduce target catch), and caught large amounts of sub-legal and female crabs.  Additionally, larger collars substantially reduced catch of target-sized crabs (although sub-legal catch was also reduced). Future work will integrate escape gaps to assist escapement. 

Effect on Bycatch: External plastic collars did not meaningfully improve size selectivity
Reference:
Brown, P., Araya-Schmidt, T., Bayse, S.M., Winger, P.D., 2026 , Exploring the effect of installing collars on snow crab (Chionoecetes opilio) pots in Newfoundland and Labrador: Do collars improve size selectivity?

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 56
  • Page 57
  • Page 58
  • Page 59
  • Page 60
  • Page 61
  • Page 62
  • Page 63
  • Current page 64

©2026 Consortium for Wildlife Bycatch Reduction  |  All rights reserved

  • Home
  • About Us
  • What's Bycatch?
    • Species List
  • Database of Publications
    • Bycatch Reduction Techniques Fact Sheets
  • Research Programs
    • Consortium Publications
  • Our Donors and Partners
  • Funding Opportunities
  • Join the Exchange
  • News
  • Events
  • Log in