Skip to main content
Home

 

Register/Add a study

Menu

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Search The Database

Search The Database

Search Database Menu

  • View All Articles
  • Techniques Glossary
  • Fishing Gear Types
  • Add a Study
Displaying 21 - 30 of 567
Location Gear Catch Technique Bycatch species Type Results

Oregon

Gillnets
Salmon
Acoustic deterrent devices
Pinnipeds Field study in the wild
Summary:

Harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) appeared to habituate to acoustic harassment devices placed on gillnets in the Oregon salmon fishery. Results, although inconclusive, demonstrate a possible reduction in damaged salmon, at least in the short-term.

Effect on Bycatch: Seals habituated to AHDs
Reference:
Geiger, A.C. and S.J. Jeffries, 1987 , Evaluation of seal harassment techniques to protect gill netted salmon.

Costa Rica

Hooks-and-Lines
Swordfish and tuna
Dyed bait
Sea Turtles Field study in the wild
Summary:

Although effective with captive loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and Kemp˙s ridley (Lepiochelys kempii) sea turtles, blue dyed bait is not effective in reducing olive ridley (Lepidochelys olivacea) and green sea turtle (Chelonia mydas) bycatch in longline fisheries in Costa Rica.

Effect on Bycatch: Did not reduce bycatch
Reference:
Swimmer, Y., R. Arauz, B. Higgins, L. McNaughton, M. McCracken, J. Ballestero, and R. Brill., 2005 , Food color and marine turtle feeding behavior: Can blue bait reduce turtle bycatch in commercial fisheries?

United States

Hooks-and-Lines
Swordfish
Circle hooks
Caretta caretta (Loggerhead turtle), Demochelys coriacea (Leatherback sea turtle) Field study in the wild
Summary:

18/0 circle hooks when compared with J hooks significantly reduce loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and leatherback (Dermocheles coriacea) sea turtle bycatch in Atlantic longline fisheries for pelagic swordfish. Circle hooks also reduced the rate of hook ingestion by loggerhead sea turtles. The combination of circle hooks and mackerel bait was the most effective in reducing sea turtle bycatch and had no negative effect on swordfish catch. Use of novel bait species (mackerel instead of squid bait) reduced loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and leatherback (Dermocheles coriacea) sea turtle bycatch in the Atlantic longline swordfish fishery. Loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta) bycatch in the Atlantic longline fishery increased with an increase in total soak time. Soak time was insignificant for swordfish but it was significant for bigeye tuna.

Effect on Bycatch: Reduced bycatch and hook ingestion
Reference:
Watson, J.W., S.P. Epperly, A.K. Shah, and D.G. Foster., 2005 , Fishing methods to reduce sea turtle mortality associated with pelagic longlines

United States

Hooks-and-Lines
Swordfish
Alternative bait
Caretta caretta (Loggerhead turtle) Field study in the wild
Summary:

18/0 circle hooks when compared with J hooks significantly reduce loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and leatherback (Dermocheles coriacea) sea turtle bycatch in Atlantic longline fisheries for pelagic swordfish. Circle hooks also reduced the rate of hook ingestion by loggerhead sea turtles. The combination of circle hooks and mackerel bait was the most effective in reducing sea turtle bycatch and had no negative effect on swordfish catch. Use of novel bait species (mackerel instead of squid bait) reduced loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and leatherback (Dermocheles coriacea) sea turtle bycatch in the Atlantic longline swordfish fishery. Loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta) bycatch in the Atlantic longline fishery increased with an increase in total soak time. Soak time was insignificant for swordfish but it was significant for bigeye tuna.

Effect on Bycatch: Use of novel bait species (mackerel instead of squid bait) reduced loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and leatherback (Dermocheles coriacea) sea turtle bycatch.
Reference:
Watson, J.W., S.P. Epperly, A.K. Shah, and D.G. Foster., 2005 , Fishing methods to reduce sea turtle mortality associated with pelagic longlines

United States

Hooks-and-Lines
Swordfish and tuna
Decreased soak time
Caretta caretta (Loggerhead turtle) Field study in the wild
Summary:

18/0 circle hooks when compared with J hooks significantly reduce loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and leatherback (Dermocheles coriacea) sea turtle bycatch in Atlantic longline fisheries for pelagic swordfish. Circle hooks also reduced the rate of hook ingestion by loggerhead sea turtles. The combination of circle hooks and mackerel bait was the most effective in reducing sea turtle bycatch and had no negative effect on swordfish catch. Use of novel bait species (mackerel instead of squid bait) reduced loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and leatherback (Dermocheles coriacea) sea turtle bycatch in the Atlantic longline swordfish fishery. Loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta) bycatch in the Atlantic longline fishery increased with an increase in total soak time. Soak time was insignificant for swordfish but it was significant for bigeye tuna.

Effect on Bycatch: Increased soak time increased bycatch
Reference:
Watson, J.W., S.P. Epperly, A.K. Shah, and D.G. Foster., 2005 , Fishing methods to reduce sea turtle mortality associated with pelagic longlines

Hawaii

Hooks-and-Lines
Tuna
Sub-surface sets (gillnets)
Seabirds Field study in the wild
Summary: Underwater setting chutes reduce bycatch of seabirds--Laysan (Phoebastria immutabilis) and Black-footed (P. nigripes) albatrosses--in the Hawaiian longline tuna fishery. The underwater setting techniques increased bait retention.
Effect on Bycatch: Reduced bycatch
Reference:
Gilman, E., C. Boggs, and N. Brothers., 2003 , Performance assessment of an underwater chute to mitigate seabird bycatch in the Hawaii pelagic longline tuna fishery

United States

Gillnets
Multiple species
Acoustic deterrent devices
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise) Field study in the wild
Summary:

Acoustic alarms reduce bycatch of harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) in the Gulf of Maine sink gillnet fishery. Gillnets with and without acoustic alarms caught similar quantities of target species, cod and pollock. Acoustic alarms did not affect catch of bycaught silver hake, but Atlantic herring was caught less frequently in experimental nets with alarms. Harbour seals depredated fish caught in both nets with and without acoustic alarms.

Effect on Bycatch: Reduced harbor porpoise bycatch
Reference:
Kraus, S.D., A.J. Read, A. Solow, K. Baldwin, T. Spradlin, E. Anderson and J. Williamson., 1997 , Acoustic alarms reduce porpoise mortality

United States

Gillnets
Multiple species
Acoustic deterrent devices
Pinnipeds Field study in the wild
Summary:

Acoustic alarms reduce bycatch of harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) in the Gulf of Maine sink gillnet fishery. Gillnets with and without acoustic alarms caught similar quantities of target species, cod and pollock. Acoustic alarms did not affect catch of bycaught silver hake, but Atlantic herring was caught less frequently in experimental nets with alarms. Harbour seals depredated fish caught in both nets with and without acoustic alarms.

Effect on Bycatch: Seals depredated nets with and without pingers
Reference:
Kraus, S.D., A.J. Read, A. Solow, K. Baldwin, T. Spradlin, E. Anderson and J. Williamson., 1997 , Acoustic alarms reduce porpoise mortality

Canada

Scallop
Fence or net barriers
Pinnipeds Field study in the wild
Summary: Barrier nets effectively excluded seals and sea lions from fishing nets in British Columbia.
Effect on Bycatch: Excluded pinnipeds
Reference:
Iwama, G., L. Nichol, and J. Ford., 1997 , Aquatic mammals and other species. Discussion Paper, Part E. Salmon Aquaculture Review; Technical Advisory Team Discussion Papers Vol. 3, British Columbia Environmental Assessment Office.

Washington State

Trout
Noxious bait
Pinnipeds Field study in the wild
Summary: Over time, noxious bait, consisting of dead steelhead containing lithium chloride, did not prevent California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) predation of Washington steelhead trout (Salmo gairdneri). Acoustic harassment devices worked only for a short time in reducing California sea lion depredation before sea lions began to habituate to sounds.
Effect on Bycatch: Did not prevent predation
Reference:
Gearin, P.J., R. Pfeifer, S.J. Jeffries, R.L. DeLong, and M.A. Johnson., 1988 , Results of the 1986-87 California sea lion-steelhead trout predation control program at the Hiram M. Chittenden Locks. NWAFC Processed Report 88-30, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, NMFS, NOAA, Seattle, Washington.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Current page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »

©2022 Consortium for Wildlife Bycatch Reduction  |  All rights reserved

  • Home
  • About Us
  • What's Bycatch?
    • Species List
  • Database of Publications
    • Bycatch Reduction Techniques Fact Sheets
  • Research Programs
    • Consortium Publications
  • Our Donors and Partners
  • Funding Opportunities
  • Join the Exchange
  • News
  • Events
  • Log in